Informeel onderwijs onder overheidstoezicht

Informal education under government control – On the banks of the Rubicon In recent years, debate has arisen as to whether some form of substantive standardisation and government oversight is warranted for informal education. That debate was prompted by suspicions that some institutions would play a negative role in conveying values such as freedom, equality and solidarity. Policy letters outlining the first contours for supervision of informal education give little reason to be reassured that a constitutionally tenable proposal is in sight. Major tensions arise with Article 23 of the Constitution (freedom of education), freedom of religion and belief, freedom of expression and freedom of association. I consider this development unnecessarily risky for the democratic rule of law and the government's ability to act. There are sufficient instruments to tackle practices that are punishable or contrary to public order. Let the government focus on those and not overplay its hand.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Tijdschrift voor Religie Recht en Beleid
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5553/tvrrb/187977842024015002005
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dutch Social and Cultural Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Informeel onderwijs onder overheidstoezicht

Paul van Sasse van IJsselt
1 citations
Tijdschrift voor Religie Recht en Beleid
Dutch Social and Cultural Studies
2.10
article

Informeel onderwijs onder overheidstoezicht

Paul van Sasse van IJsselt
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Informal education under government control – On the banks of the Rubicon In recent years, debate has arisen as to whether some form of substantive standardisation and government oversight is warranted for informal education. That debate was prompted by suspicions that some institutions would play a negative role in conveying values such as freedom, equality and solidarity. Policy letters outlining the first contours for supervision of informal education give little reason to be reassured that a constitutionally tenable proposal is in sight. Major tensions arise with Article 23 of the Constitution (freedom of education), freedom of religion and belief, freedom of expression and freedom of association. I consider this development unnecessarily risky for the democratic rule of law and the government's ability to act. There are sufficient instruments to tackle practices that are punishable or contrary to public order. Let the government focus on those and not overplay its hand.

Tijdschrift voor Religie Recht en BeleidVol. 15(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Dutch Social and Cultural Studies
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.