Exploring Process Performance of Envelope Opening and Ballot Extraction Options in Vote-by-Mail: A Utah Case Study

Vote-by-Mail (VBM) has become increasingly popular over the last decade, but the process is executed differently even between jurisdictions within the same state. Currently, most VBM literature focuses on topics from the perspective of political science, and little-to-no work features analysis of operational aspects or human-machine interactions. Depending on the jurisdiction size, these VBM process steps are executed by humans, machines, or a combination of machines supporting humans. The opening-extraction process step of envelope opening and ballot extraction is always necessary. Therefore, the literature needs to consider the process execution of VBM ballots, the possible support of machines, and human-machine interactions in the VBM tabulation processes. This study compares two opening-extraction options to open envelopes and extract ballots in the VBM tabulation process. This research demonstrates that no one system of opening-extraction is generally better than the other, but some trade-offs need to be considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2024-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241274424
Primary Topic
Auction Theory and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Process Performance of Envelope Opening and Ballot Extraction Options in Vote-by-Mail: A Utah Case Study

Gretchen A. Macht, Leonie S. Otte
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Auction Theory and Applications
article

Exploring Process Performance of Envelope Opening and Ballot Extraction Options in Vote-by-Mail: A Utah Case Study

Gretchen A. Macht, Leonie S. Otte
article en

Abstract

Vote-by-Mail (VBM) has become increasingly popular over the last decade, but the process is executed differently even between jurisdictions within the same state. Currently, most VBM literature focuses on topics from the perspective of political science, and little-to-no work features analysis of operational aspects or human-machine interactions. Depending on the jurisdiction size, these VBM process steps are executed by humans, machines, or a combination of machines supporting humans. The opening-extraction process step of envelope opening and ballot extraction is always necessary. Therefore, the literature needs to consider the process execution of VBM ballots, the possible support of machines, and human-machine interactions in the VBM tabulation processes. This study compares two opening-extraction options to open envelopes and extract ballots in the VBM tabulation process. This research demonstrates that no one system of opening-extraction is generally better than the other, but some trade-offs need to be considered.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 68(1)
University of Rhode Island (US)
University of Rhode Island
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Auction Theory and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.