Safety Assessment on the Safety and Efficacy of <i>Pediococcus pentosaceus</i> DSM 32292 as a Feed Additive for All Animal Species (RP552)

An application was submitted to the Food Standards Agency in March 2021 from Microferm Limited (‘the applicant’) for the new authorisation of an additive ( Pediococcus pentosaceus DSM 32292), under the category of ‘technical additive’ and functional group ‘silage additives’. The additive is proposed to be used in all animal species, with a proposed minimum content of 1 x 10 10 CFU / g to be applied to silage at a minimum of 5 x 10 7 CFU / kg. To support the Food Standards Agency (FSA) and Food Standards Scotland (FSS) in evaluating the dossier, the Animal Feed and Feed Additives Joint Expert Group (AFFAJEG) and the Advisory Committee on Animal Feedingstuffs (ACAF) were asked to review the dossier and the supplementary information from the applicant. The FSA/FSS concluded, based on the ACAF’s advice, that the additive was correctly identified and characterised, and that the additive can be considered safe for the target species, consumer, and the environment. The additive was identified as potentially harmful by contact with skin or eyes and a respiratory sensitiser. It was concluded that the additive can be considered efficacious for moderately difficult to ensile forages. No conclusion could be reached on efficacy for difficult to ensile forages. The views of AFFAJEG and ACAF have been taken into account in the safety assessment which represents the opinion of the FSA and FSS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
FSA research and evidence.
Published
2024-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46756/001c.121317
Primary Topic
Agricultural safety and regulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety Assessment on the Safety and Efficacy of Pediococcus pentosaceus DSM 32292 as a Feed Additive for All Animal Species (RP552)

Food Standards Agency, Food Standards Scotland
FSA research and evidence.
Agricultural safety and regulations
article

Safety Assessment on the Safety and Efficacy of Pediococcus pentosaceus DSM 32292 as a Feed Additive for All Animal Species (RP552)

Food Standards Agency, Food Standards Scotland
article en

Abstract

An application was submitted to the Food Standards Agency in March 2021 from Microferm Limited (‘the applicant’) for the new authorisation of an additive ( Pediococcus pentosaceus DSM 32292), under the category of ‘technical additive’ and functional group ‘silage additives’. The additive is proposed to be used in all animal species, with a proposed minimum content of 1 x 10 10 CFU / g to be applied to silage at a minimum of 5 x 10 7 CFU / kg. To support the Food Standards Agency (FSA) and Food Standards Scotland (FSS) in evaluating the dossier, the Animal Feed and Feed Additives Joint Expert Group (AFFAJEG) and the Advisory Committee on Animal Feedingstuffs (ACAF) were asked to review the dossier and the supplementary information from the applicant. The FSA/FSS concluded, based on the ACAF’s advice, that the additive was correctly identified and characterised, and that the additive can be considered safe for the target species, consumer, and the environment. The additive was identified as potentially harmful by contact with skin or eyes and a respiratory sensitiser. It was concluded that the additive can be considered efficacious for moderately difficult to ensile forages. No conclusion could be reached on efficacy for difficult to ensile forages. The views of AFFAJEG and ACAF have been taken into account in the safety assessment which represents the opinion of the FSA and FSS.

FSA research and evidence.
Food Standards Scotland (GB), Food Standards Agency (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Agricultural safety and regulations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.