The Coexistence of Arbitration and Trans-Border Bankruptcy

This article highlights the relationship between arbitration and cross-border insolvency proceedings and the most problematic issues that arise: whether an arbitration agreement becomes unenforceable once insolvency proceedings have commenced; whether an arbitration agreement can be entered into after insolvency proceedings have commenced; and the impact of cross-border insolvency on the enforceability of an arbitral award. The author describes approaches of different jurisdictions and identifies following approaches as prevailing: suspension of arbitration until the end of insolvency proceedings; termination of arbitration proceedings. Based on judicial practice, the author concludes that it is necessary to adopt an international legal act regulating the coexistence of arbitration and cross-border insolvency. In addition, the author touches upon other aspects of the «relationship» between arbitration and cross-border insolvency: the question of applicable law; conflicts of jurisdiction; and collision of national laws.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Arbitrazh-civil procedure
Published
2024-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2024-8-48-50
Primary Topic
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Coexistence of Arbitration and Trans-Border Bankruptcy

Anastasia A. Selkova
Arbitrazh-civil procedure
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
article

The Coexistence of Arbitration and Trans-Border Bankruptcy

Anastasia A. Selkova
article en

Abstract

This article highlights the relationship between arbitration and cross-border insolvency proceedings and the most problematic issues that arise: whether an arbitration agreement becomes unenforceable once insolvency proceedings have commenced; whether an arbitration agreement can be entered into after insolvency proceedings have commenced; and the impact of cross-border insolvency on the enforceability of an arbitral award. The author describes approaches of different jurisdictions and identifies following approaches as prevailing: suspension of arbitration until the end of insolvency proceedings; termination of arbitration proceedings. Based on judicial practice, the author concludes that it is necessary to adopt an international legal act regulating the coexistence of arbitration and cross-border insolvency. In addition, the author touches upon other aspects of the «relationship» between arbitration and cross-border insolvency: the question of applicable law; conflicts of jurisdiction; and collision of national laws.

Arbitrazh-civil procedure
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Coexistence of Arbitration and Trans-Border Bankruptcy — Anastasia A. Selkova · Arbitrazh-civil procedure (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS