Fire weather compromises forestation-reliant climate mitigation pathways

Abstract. Forestation can contribute to climate change mitigation. However, increasing frequency and intensity of climate extremes are posed to have profound impact on forests and consequently on the mitigation potential of forestation efforts. In this perspective, we critically assess forestation-reliant climate mitigation scenarios from five different integrated assessment models (IAMs) by showcasing the spatially explicit exposure of forests to fire weather and the simulated increase in global annual burned area. We provide a detailed description of the feedback from climate change to forest carbon uptake in IAMs. Few IAMs are currently accounting for feedback mechanisms like loss from fire disturbance. Consequently, many forestation areas proposed by IAM scenarios will be exposed to fire-promoting weather conditions and without costly prevention measures might be object to frequent burning. We conclude that the actual climate mitigation portfolio in IAM scenarios is subject to substantial uncertainty and that the risk of overly optimistic estimates of negative emission potential of forestation should be avoided. As a way forward we propose how to integrate more detailed climate information when modeling climate mitigation pathways heavily relying on forestation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth System Dynamics
Published
2024-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1055-2024
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fire weather compromises forestation-reliant climate mitigation pathways

Jonathan Doelman, Sonia Isabelle Seneviratne, Peter Havlík, Kanishka B. Narayan et al.
13 citations
Earth System Dynamics
Fire effects on ecosystems
3.67
article

Fire weather compromises forestation-reliant climate mitigation pathways

Jonathan Doelman, Sonia Isabelle Seneviratne, Peter Havlík, Kanishka B. Narayan, Mykola Gusti, Stefan Frank, Ryan S. Padrón, Jonas Schwaab, Michael Windisch, Florian Humpenöder, Andrey Lessa Derci Augustynczik, Detlef Peter van Vuuren, Yann Quilcaille, Michael Wögerer, Alexander Popp, Christoph Müller, Felix Jaeger
article en
13 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Forestation can contribute to climate change mitigation. However, increasing frequency and intensity of climate extremes are posed to have profound impact on forests and consequently on the mitigation potential of forestation efforts. In this perspective, we critically assess forestation-reliant climate mitigation scenarios from five different integrated assessment models (IAMs) by showcasing the spatially explicit exposure of forests to fire weather and the simulated increase in global annual burned area. We provide a detailed description of the feedback from climate change to forest carbon uptake in IAMs. Few IAMs are currently accounting for feedback mechanisms like loss from fire disturbance. Consequently, many forestation areas proposed by IAM scenarios will be exposed to fire-promoting weather conditions and without costly prevention measures might be object to frequent burning. We conclude that the actual climate mitigation portfolio in IAM scenarios is subject to substantial uncertainty and that the risk of overly optimistic estimates of negative emission potential of forestation should be avoided. As a way forward we propose how to integrate more detailed climate information when modeling climate mitigation pathways heavily relying on forestation.

Earth System DynamicsVol. 15(4)
Joint Global Change Research Institute (US), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT), Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (NL), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US), Utrecht University (NL), Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (CH), Leibniz Association (DE), ETH Zurich (CH), Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE)
European Commission, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Staatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und Innovation, Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving, H2020 European Research Council, FP7 Ideas: European Research Council
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Fire effects on ecosystems
3.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.