Androgen receptor markers do not differ between nonresponders and responders to resistance training-induced muscle hypertrophy

The aim of this study was to investigate whether baseline values and acute and chronic changes in androgen receptors (AR) markers, including total AR, cytoplasmic (cAR), and nuclear (nAR) fractions, as well as DNA-binding activity (AR-DNA), are involved in muscle hypertrophy responsiveness by comparing young nonresponder and responder individuals. After 10 wk of resistance training (RT), participants were identified as nonresponders using two typical errors (TE) obtained through two muscle cross-sectional area (mCSA) ultrasound measurements (2 × TE; 4.94%), and the highest responders within our sample were numerically matched. Muscle biopsies were performed at baseline, 24 h after the first RT session (acute responses), and 96 h after the last session (chronic responses). AR, cAR, and nAR were analyzed using Western blotting, and AR-DNA was analyzed using an ELISA-oligonucleotide assay. Twelve participants were identified as nonresponders (ΔmCSA: -1.32%) and 12 as responders (ΔmCSA: 21.35%). There were no baseline differences between groups in mCSA, AR, cAR, nAR, or AR-DNA (<i>P</i> > 0.05). For acute responses, there was a significant difference between nonresponders (+19.5%) and responders (-14.4%) in AR-DNA [effect size (ES) = -1.39; 95% confidence interval (CI): -2.53 to -0.16; <i>P</i> = 0.015]. There were no acute between-group differences in any other AR markers (<i>P</i> > 0.05). No significant differences between groups were observed in chronic responses across any AR markers (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Nonresponders and responders presented similar baseline, acute, and chronic results for the majority of the AR markers. Thus, our findings do not support the influence of AR markers on muscle hypertrophy responsiveness to RT in untrained individuals.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> We explored, for the first time, the influence of androgen receptor (AR) through the separation of cytoplasmic and nuclear cell fractions [i.e., cytoplasmic androgen receptor (cAR), nuclear androgen receptor (nAR), and androgen receptor DNA-binding activity (AR-DNA)] on muscle hypertrophy responsiveness to resistance training. The absence of muscle hypertrophy in naïve individuals does not seem to be explained by baseline values, and acute or chronic changes in AR markers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2024-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00354.2024
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Androgen receptor markers do not differ between nonresponders and responders to resistance training-induced muscle hypertrophy

Cleiton Augusto Libardi, Nathalia F. Dias, João Guilherme Almeida Bergamasco, Felipe C. Vechin et al.
1 citations
Journal of Applied Physiology
Sports Performance and Training
0.48
article

Androgen receptor markers do not differ between nonresponders and responders to resistance training-induced muscle hypertrophy

Cleiton Augusto Libardi, Nathalia F. Dias, João Guilherme Almeida Bergamasco, Felipe C. Vechin, Joshua S. Godwin, Diego Bittencourt, Andreas N. Kavazis, Michael D. Roberts, Talisson S. Chaves, Paulo H. C. Mesquita, Deivid Gomes da Silva, Vitor Angleri, Maíra C. Scarpelli, Carlos Ugrinowitsch, Jonathan Michel, Ricardo A. Medalha, Paulo C. Carello Filho, Luiz Augusto Riani Costa
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate whether baseline values and acute and chronic changes in androgen receptors (AR) markers, including total AR, cytoplasmic (cAR), and nuclear (nAR) fractions, as well as DNA-binding activity (AR-DNA), are involved in muscle hypertrophy responsiveness by comparing young nonresponder and responder individuals. After 10 wk of resistance training (RT), participants were identified as nonresponders using two typical errors (TE) obtained through two muscle cross-sectional area (mCSA) ultrasound measurements (2 × TE; 4.94%), and the highest responders within our sample were numerically matched. Muscle biopsies were performed at baseline, 24 h after the first RT session (acute responses), and 96 h after the last session (chronic responses). AR, cAR, and nAR were analyzed using Western blotting, and AR-DNA was analyzed using an ELISA-oligonucleotide assay. Twelve participants were identified as nonresponders (ΔmCSA: -1.32%) and 12 as responders (ΔmCSA: 21.35%). There were no baseline differences between groups in mCSA, AR, cAR, nAR, or AR-DNA (<i>P</i> > 0.05). For acute responses, there was a significant difference between nonresponders (+19.5%) and responders (-14.4%) in AR-DNA [effect size (ES) = -1.39; 95% confidence interval (CI): -2.53 to -0.16; <i>P</i> = 0.015]. There were no acute between-group differences in any other AR markers (<i>P</i> > 0.05). No significant differences between groups were observed in chronic responses across any AR markers (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Nonresponders and responders presented similar baseline, acute, and chronic results for the majority of the AR markers. Thus, our findings do not support the influence of AR markers on muscle hypertrophy responsiveness to RT in untrained individuals.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> We explored, for the first time, the influence of androgen receptor (AR) through the separation of cytoplasmic and nuclear cell fractions [i.e., cytoplasmic androgen receptor (cAR), nuclear androgen receptor (nAR), and androgen receptor DNA-binding activity (AR-DNA)] on muscle hypertrophy responsiveness to resistance training. The absence of muscle hypertrophy in naïve individuals does not seem to be explained by baseline values, and acute or chronic changes in AR markers.

Journal of Applied PhysiologyVol. 137(4)
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Auburn University (US), University of Tampa (US)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Sports Performance and Training
0.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.