Conformational Modulation of a Mobile Loop Controls Catalysis in the (βα) <sub>8</sub> -Barrel Enzyme of Histidine Biosynthesis HisF

The overall significance of loop motions for enzymatic activity is generally accepted. However, it has largely remained unclear whether and how such motions can control different steps of catalysis. We have studied this problem on the example of the mobile active site β<sub>1</sub>α<sub>1</sub>-loop (loop1) of the (βα)<sub>8</sub>-barrel enzyme HisF, which is the cyclase subunit of imidazole glycerol phosphate synthase. Loop1 variants containing single mutations of conserved amino acids showed drastically reduced rates for the turnover of the substrates <i>N</i>'-[(5'-phosphoribulosyl) formimino]-5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide (PrFAR) and ammonia to the products imidazole glycerol phosphate (ImGP) and 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-ribotide (AICAR). A comprehensive mechanistic analysis including stopped-flow kinetics, X-ray crystallography, NMR spectroscopy, and molecular dynamics simulations detected three conformations of loop1 (open, detached, closed) whose populations differed between wild-type HisF and functionally affected loop1 variants. Transient stopped-flow kinetic experiments demonstrated that wt-HisF binds PrFAR by an induced-fit mechanism whereas catalytically impaired loop1 variants bind PrFAR by a simple two-state mechanism. Our findings suggest that PrFAR-induced formation of the closed conformation of loop1 brings active site residues in a productive orientation for chemical turnover, which we show to be the rate-limiting step of HisF catalysis. After the cyclase reaction, the closed loop conformation is destabilized, which favors the formation of detached and open conformations and hence facilitates the release of the products ImGP and AICAR. Our data demonstrate how different conformations of active site loops contribute to different catalytic steps, a finding that is presumably of broad relevance for the reaction mechanisms of (βα)<sub>8</sub>-barrel enzymes and beyond.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JACS Au
Published
2024-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.4c00558
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Protein Structure and Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.51

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conformational Modulation of a Mobile Loop Controls Catalysis in the (βα) 8 -Barrel Enzyme of Histidine Biosynthesis HisF

Reinhard Sterner, Jan Philip Wurm, Chitra Rajendran, Eva Vos et al.
15 citations
JACS Au
Protein Structure and Dynamics
3.51
article

Conformational Modulation of a Mobile Loop Controls Catalysis in the (βα) 8 -Barrel Enzyme of Histidine Biosynthesis HisF

Reinhard Sterner, Jan Philip Wurm, Chitra Rajendran, Eva Vos, Dariia Yehorova, Enrico Hupfeld, Remco Sprangers, Dinesh Raju, Sandra Schlee, Shina Caroline Lynn Kamerlin
article en
15 citations

Abstract

The overall significance of loop motions for enzymatic activity is generally accepted. However, it has largely remained unclear whether and how such motions can control different steps of catalysis. We have studied this problem on the example of the mobile active site β<sub>1</sub>α<sub>1</sub>-loop (loop1) of the (βα)<sub>8</sub>-barrel enzyme HisF, which is the cyclase subunit of imidazole glycerol phosphate synthase. Loop1 variants containing single mutations of conserved amino acids showed drastically reduced rates for the turnover of the substrates <i>N</i>'-[(5'-phosphoribulosyl) formimino]-5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide (PrFAR) and ammonia to the products imidazole glycerol phosphate (ImGP) and 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-ribotide (AICAR). A comprehensive mechanistic analysis including stopped-flow kinetics, X-ray crystallography, NMR spectroscopy, and molecular dynamics simulations detected three conformations of loop1 (open, detached, closed) whose populations differed between wild-type HisF and functionally affected loop1 variants. Transient stopped-flow kinetic experiments demonstrated that wt-HisF binds PrFAR by an induced-fit mechanism whereas catalytically impaired loop1 variants bind PrFAR by a simple two-state mechanism. Our findings suggest that PrFAR-induced formation of the closed conformation of loop1 brings active site residues in a productive orientation for chemical turnover, which we show to be the rate-limiting step of HisF catalysis. After the cyclase reaction, the closed loop conformation is destabilized, which favors the formation of detached and open conformations and hence facilitates the release of the products ImGP and AICAR. Our data demonstrate how different conformations of active site loops contribute to different catalytic steps, a finding that is presumably of broad relevance for the reaction mechanisms of (βα)<sub>8</sub>-barrel enzymes and beyond.

JACS AuVol. 4(8)
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), University of Regensburg (DE)
National Science Foundation, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Vetenskapsrådet, Centrum för idrottsforskning
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Protein Structure and Dynamics
3.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.