AB034. Medico-legal ethics dilemma in treatment decisions for intracranial metastasis in a young gravida patient: a case report

This case underscores the challenges in managing intracranial metastasis in pregnancy, necessitating a multidisciplinary approach for optimal management while minimizing harm. In this case, the ethical aspect of patient autonomy is evident as the patient and her family consented to the medical interventions, despite the risks involved. The principle of beneficence and non-maleficence is demonstrated through the medical team's diagnostic and medical interventions aiming to prevent unnecessary harm to the patient and fetus while still providing effective care for the patient. In terms of justice, the patients get fair access to healthcare resources and treatments, regardless of socioeconomic status. Unfortunately, the patient's condition worsened due to cancer progression. In conclusion, the case highlights the importance of respecting patient autonomy while striving to act in their best interests through beneficent medical intervention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chinese Clinical Oncology
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21037/cco-24-ab034
Primary Topic
Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AB034. Medico-legal ethics dilemma in treatment decisions for intracranial metastasis in a young gravida patient: a case report

Errol Untung Hutagalung, Jeffry Beta Tenggara, Anne Dina Soebroto, Jessica Herlambang et al.
Chinese Clinical Oncology
Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

AB034. Medico-legal ethics dilemma in treatment decisions for intracranial metastasis in a young gravida patient: a case report

Errol Untung Hutagalung, Jeffry Beta Tenggara, Anne Dina Soebroto, Jessica Herlambang, Henry Riyanto Sofyan, Ribka Bella Simorangkir, Made Agus Mahendra Inggas, Christine Banjarnahor, Joyce Bratanata, Alvin Setiawan
article en

Abstract

This case underscores the challenges in managing intracranial metastasis in pregnancy, necessitating a multidisciplinary approach for optimal management while minimizing harm. In this case, the ethical aspect of patient autonomy is evident as the patient and her family consented to the medical interventions, despite the risks involved. The principle of beneficence and non-maleficence is demonstrated through the medical team's diagnostic and medical interventions aiming to prevent unnecessary harm to the patient and fetus while still providing effective care for the patient. In terms of justice, the patients get fair access to healthcare resources and treatments, regardless of socioeconomic status. Unfortunately, the patient's condition worsened due to cancer progression. In conclusion, the case highlights the importance of respecting patient autonomy while striving to act in their best interests through beneficent medical intervention.

Chinese Clinical OncologyVol. 13(Suppl 1)
Siloam Eye Hospital (KR)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AB034. Medico-legal ethics dilemma in treatment decisions for intracranial metastasis in a young gravida patient: a case report — Errol Untung Hutagalung, Jeffry Beta Tenggara, et al. · Chinese Clinical Oncology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS