Visualization Functions in Argumentation Representation Software

In the historical development of argumentation as a scientific direction and applied field, a number of ways of its visual representation have been developed. In the middle of the 20th century, within the framework of the theory of argumentation, in addition to the logical, rhetorical and computational concepts used since ancient times, new concepts were formulated that shaped the basis for the representation of argumentation using software. First of all, this foundation was laid by researchers who put forward new approaches to its formalization (Stephen Toulmin, Phan Mihn Dung). Since the beginning of the 21st century, the dynamics of informatization of scientific activity and education have led to the development of software designed to represent argumentation and evidence-based reasoning. Both textual and graphical tools are used in the software to visually represent argumentation for solving various tasks depending on the purpose of using the software. We examine the possibilities of the existing software for visualization of argumentation and identify its features and main functions, which open a possibility for a more justified and goal-oriented selection of appropriate tools for the effective solution of various tasks. The article is based on the results of a talk and discussion at the All-Russian scientific conference "Scientific service on the Internet" in 2023.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Visualization
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26583/sv.16.3.11
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Visualization Functions in Argumentation Representation Software

Elena Lisanyuk, Dmitry Prokudin, Ildar Baymuratov
1 citations
Scientific Visualization
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
0.78
article

Visualization Functions in Argumentation Representation Software

Elena Lisanyuk, Dmitry Prokudin, Ildar Baymuratov
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In the historical development of argumentation as a scientific direction and applied field, a number of ways of its visual representation have been developed. In the middle of the 20th century, within the framework of the theory of argumentation, in addition to the logical, rhetorical and computational concepts used since ancient times, new concepts were formulated that shaped the basis for the representation of argumentation using software. First of all, this foundation was laid by researchers who put forward new approaches to its formalization (Stephen Toulmin, Phan Mihn Dung). Since the beginning of the 21st century, the dynamics of informatization of scientific activity and education have led to the development of software designed to represent argumentation and evidence-based reasoning. Both textual and graphical tools are used in the software to visually represent argumentation for solving various tasks depending on the purpose of using the software. We examine the possibilities of the existing software for visualization of argumentation and identify its features and main functions, which open a possibility for a more justified and goal-oriented selection of appropriate tools for the effective solution of various tasks. The article is based on the results of a talk and discussion at the All-Russian scientific conference "Scientific service on the Internet" in 2023.

Scientific VisualizationVol. 16(3)
Leibniz University Hannover (DE), National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU), Russian Academy of Sciences (RU), St Petersburg University (RU)
Saint Petersburg State University, Russian Science Foundation
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
0.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Visualization Functions in Argumentation Representation Software — Elena Lisanyuk, Dmitry Prokudin, et al. · Scientific Visualization (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS