High-Throughput Sequencing Analysis Revealed a Preference for Animal-Based Food in Purple Sea Urchins

Sea urchins play an important role in marine ecosystems. Owing to limitations in previous research methods, there has been insufficient understanding of the food sources and ecological functional value of purple sea urchins, leading to considerable controversy regarding their functional positioning. We focused on Daya Bay as the research area, utilizing stable isotope technology and high-throughput sequencing of 16S rDNA and 18S rDNA to analyze sea urchins and their potential food sources in stone and algae areas. The results showed that the δ<sup>13</sup>C range of purple sea urchins in the stone area is -11.42~-8.17‱, and the δ<sup>15</sup>N range is 9.15~10.31‱. However, in the algal area, the δ<sup>13</sup>C range is -13.97~-12.44‱, and the δ<sup>15</sup>N range is 8.75~10.14‱. There was a significant difference in δ<sup>13</sup>C between the two areas (<i>p</i> < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in δ<sup>15</sup>N (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The main food source for purple sea urchins in both areas is sediment. The sequencing results of 18S rDNA revealed that, in the algal area, the highest proportion in the sea urchin gut was <i>Molluska</i> (57.37%). In the stone area, the highest proportion was <i>Arthropoda</i> (76.71%). The sequencing results of 16S rDNA revealed that, in the algal area, <i>Bacteroidetes</i> was the dominant group in the sea urchin gut (28.87%), whereas, in the stone area, <i>Proteobacteria</i> was the dominant group (37.83%). Diversity detection revealed a significant difference in the number of gut microbes and eukaryotes between the stone and algal areas (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The results revealed that the main food source of purple sea urchins in both areas is sediment, but the organic nutritional value is greater in the algal area, and the richness of microbiota and eukaryotes in the gut of purple sea urchins in the stone area is greater. These results indicated that purple sea urchins are likely omnivores and that the area where they occur impacts their growth and development. The results of this study provide a theoretical basis for the restoration of wild purple sea urchin resources and the selection of areas for restocking and release.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biology
Published
2024-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13080623
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Marine and coastal plant biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High-Throughput Sequencing Analysis Revealed a Preference for Animal-Based Food in Purple Sea Urchins

Zerui Liu, Chuanxin Qin, Yu Guo, Jia Zhang et al.
4 citations
Biology
Marine and coastal plant biology
1.92
article

High-Throughput Sequencing Analysis Revealed a Preference for Animal-Based Food in Purple Sea Urchins

Zerui Liu, Chuanxin Qin, Yu Guo, Jia Zhang, Xiaohui Mu
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Sea urchins play an important role in marine ecosystems. Owing to limitations in previous research methods, there has been insufficient understanding of the food sources and ecological functional value of purple sea urchins, leading to considerable controversy regarding their functional positioning. We focused on Daya Bay as the research area, utilizing stable isotope technology and high-throughput sequencing of 16S rDNA and 18S rDNA to analyze sea urchins and their potential food sources in stone and algae areas. The results showed that the δ<sup>13</sup>C range of purple sea urchins in the stone area is -11.42~-8.17‱, and the δ<sup>15</sup>N range is 9.15~10.31‱. However, in the algal area, the δ<sup>13</sup>C range is -13.97~-12.44‱, and the δ<sup>15</sup>N range is 8.75~10.14‱. There was a significant difference in δ<sup>13</sup>C between the two areas (<i>p</i> < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in δ<sup>15</sup>N (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The main food source for purple sea urchins in both areas is sediment. The sequencing results of 18S rDNA revealed that, in the algal area, the highest proportion in the sea urchin gut was <i>Molluska</i> (57.37%). In the stone area, the highest proportion was <i>Arthropoda</i> (76.71%). The sequencing results of 16S rDNA revealed that, in the algal area, <i>Bacteroidetes</i> was the dominant group in the sea urchin gut (28.87%), whereas, in the stone area, <i>Proteobacteria</i> was the dominant group (37.83%). Diversity detection revealed a significant difference in the number of gut microbes and eukaryotes between the stone and algal areas (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The results revealed that the main food source of purple sea urchins in both areas is sediment, but the organic nutritional value is greater in the algal area, and the richness of microbiota and eukaryotes in the gut of purple sea urchins in the stone area is greater. These results indicated that purple sea urchins are likely omnivores and that the area where they occur impacts their growth and development. The results of this study provide a theoretical basis for the restoration of wild purple sea urchin resources and the selection of areas for restocking and release.

BiologyVol. 13(8)
Sanya University (CN), Shanghai Ocean University (CN), Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Marine and coastal plant biology
1.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.