An Exploration of LGBTQA+ Young People’s Coping Strategies When Navigating Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors

LGBTQA+ young people experience suicidal thoughts and behaviors at a much greater rate than their heterosexual and cisgender peers. This study explored firsthand accounts of the coping strategies employed by LGBTQA+ young people when experiencing suicidal thoughts and behaviors. LGBTQA+ young people (<i>N</i> = 27; ages 14-25) in Australia with a history of suicidal thoughts and/or attempts participated in semi-structured interviews. Using reflexive thematic analysis, four major themes were developed: (1) <i>It's about the journey, not the destination</i>, (2) <i>Connecting with others</i>, (3) <i>When I knew better, I coped better</i>, and (4) <i>Doing the best I can with what I have</i>. LGBTQA+ young people reported utilizing a range of coping strategies, however these were limited by a lack of knowledge around mental health, gender and sexuality diversity, and available resources. Experiences of discrimination within support settings and limited access to clinicians with knowledge of sexuality and gender diversity were cited as significant barriers. Interventions to increase mental health literacy in LGBTQA+ young people and improvements to clinician knowledge of sexuality and gender diversity are needed to enhance LGBTQA+ young people's access to effective coping strategies when experiencing suicidal thoughts and behaviors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Homosexuality
Published
2024-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2024.2382811
Citations
1
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Exploration of LGBTQA+ Young People’s Coping Strategies When Navigating Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors

Ashleigh Peng Lin, Penelope Strauss, Angus Cook, Elizabeth A. Newnham et al.
1 citations
Journal of Homosexuality
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
0.64
article

An Exploration of LGBTQA+ Young People’s Coping Strategies When Navigating Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors

Ashleigh Peng Lin, Penelope Strauss, Angus Cook, Elizabeth A. Newnham, Larissa Marion, Helen Morgan, Yael Perry
article en
1 citations

Abstract

LGBTQA+ young people experience suicidal thoughts and behaviors at a much greater rate than their heterosexual and cisgender peers. This study explored firsthand accounts of the coping strategies employed by LGBTQA+ young people when experiencing suicidal thoughts and behaviors. LGBTQA+ young people (<i>N</i> = 27; ages 14-25) in Australia with a history of suicidal thoughts and/or attempts participated in semi-structured interviews. Using reflexive thematic analysis, four major themes were developed: (1) <i>It's about the journey, not the destination</i>, (2) <i>Connecting with others</i>, (3) <i>When I knew better, I coped better</i>, and (4) <i>Doing the best I can with what I have</i>. LGBTQA+ young people reported utilizing a range of coping strategies, however these were limited by a lack of knowledge around mental health, gender and sexuality diversity, and available resources. Experiences of discrimination within support settings and limited access to clinicians with knowledge of sexuality and gender diversity were cited as significant barriers. Interventions to increase mental health literacy in LGBTQA+ young people and improvements to clinician knowledge of sexuality and gender diversity are needed to enhance LGBTQA+ young people's access to effective coping strategies when experiencing suicidal thoughts and behaviors.

Journal of HomosexualityVol. 72(8)
Harvard University (US), The Kids Research Institute Australia (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), Curtin University (AU)
AMP Foundation
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.