Border Carbon Adjustments and Leakage in the Presence of Public Pollution Abatement Activities

Abstract This paper sheds light on the unidentified effects of unilateral environmental and trade actions within an international trade framework with two large open economies, transboundary pollution, and Public Pollution Abatement (PPA) activities. When private and public abatement coexists in the exporting country, stricter environmental policy by the importing one magnifies the carbon leakage effect. Pareto efficiency dictates that Border Carbon Adjustment (BCA) should account not only for the difference in carbon taxes between the two countries, but also for the policy’s unintended consequences on PPA. More importantly, we argue that a conditional reduction of BCA, subject to stricter environmental policy by the country that exports the polluting good, decreases global pollution and increases countries’ welfare. Such reform strategy generates strong incentives for countries with laxer environmental policy to adopt a stricter one.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental and Resource Economics
Published
2024-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-024-00882-x
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Border Carbon Adjustments and Leakage in the Presence of Public Pollution Abatement Activities

Nikolaos Vlassis, Nikos Tsakiris
4 citations
Environmental and Resource Economics
Climate Change Policy and Economics
4.52
article

Border Carbon Adjustments and Leakage in the Presence of Public Pollution Abatement Activities

Nikolaos Vlassis, Nikos Tsakiris
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper sheds light on the unidentified effects of unilateral environmental and trade actions within an international trade framework with two large open economies, transboundary pollution, and Public Pollution Abatement (PPA) activities. When private and public abatement coexists in the exporting country, stricter environmental policy by the importing one magnifies the carbon leakage effect. Pareto efficiency dictates that Border Carbon Adjustment (BCA) should account not only for the difference in carbon taxes between the two countries, but also for the policy’s unintended consequences on PPA. More importantly, we argue that a conditional reduction of BCA, subject to stricter environmental policy by the country that exports the polluting good, decreases global pollution and increases countries’ welfare. Such reform strategy generates strong incentives for countries with laxer environmental policy to adopt a stricter one.

Environmental and Resource EconomicsVol. 87(9)
University of Ioannina (GR), University of Aberdeen (GB)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
4.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.