Hotter weather, less of a hoax? Testing the longitudinal association between experience of temperature anomalies and belief in climate change conspiracy theories

While people across the world are experiencing hotter summers, there is still a considerable number of people who believe that climate change is a hoax. It thus raises the question of whether the experience of local temperature anomalies would influence people's beliefs about climate change conspiracy. To address this question, we conducted a two-wave longitudinal study with participants from the U.S. (Study 1) and mainland China (Study 2), respectively. We expect that the experience of temperature anomalies would serve as a cognitive proxy that counteracts the hoax conspiracy narratives and thus would be negatively related to belief in such narratives. We further explored whether this negative association would be related to less perceived psychological distance, stronger negative emotions, and more climate change-related information exposure; and whether it would be weaker among people who tended to interpret things in a conspiracist manner (i.e., conspiracy mentality). In Study 1, our results support the hypothesized links cross-sectionally and longitudinally on the subjective experience of hotter summer, except for climate change-related information exposure. In Study 2, we found only cross-sectional associations between the constructs, except for climate change-related information exposure. Lastly, we found mixed evidence regarding the moderating role of conspiracy mentality between the studies. Our findings provide initial support that climate change conspiracy beliefs are malleable to people's subjective experience of temperature anomalies. The happening of temperature anomalies could be a crucial opportunity for promoting scientific understanding of climate change. • The subjective experience of a hotter summer related to less climate change conspiracy beliefs. • We explored the mediating roles of perceived less psychological distance, stronger negative emotions, and more information exposure. • We observed longitudinal links in the U.S. and cross-sectional links in China. • Climate change conspiracy beliefs are malleable to people's subjective experiences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Published
2024-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102409
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hotter weather, less of a hoax? Testing the longitudinal association between experience of temperature anomalies and belief in climate change conspiracy theories

Ying‐yi Hong, Hoi‐Wing Chan, Kim‐Pong Tam, Xue Wang et al.
6 citations
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Climate Change Communication and Perception
6.79
article

Hotter weather, less of a hoax? Testing the longitudinal association between experience of temperature anomalies and belief in climate change conspiracy theories

Ying‐yi Hong, Hoi‐Wing Chan, Kim‐Pong Tam, Xue Wang, Bo Huang
article en
6 citations

Abstract

While people across the world are experiencing hotter summers, there is still a considerable number of people who believe that climate change is a hoax. It thus raises the question of whether the experience of local temperature anomalies would influence people's beliefs about climate change conspiracy. To address this question, we conducted a two-wave longitudinal study with participants from the U.S. (Study 1) and mainland China (Study 2), respectively. We expect that the experience of temperature anomalies would serve as a cognitive proxy that counteracts the hoax conspiracy narratives and thus would be negatively related to belief in such narratives. We further explored whether this negative association would be related to less perceived psychological distance, stronger negative emotions, and more climate change-related information exposure; and whether it would be weaker among people who tended to interpret things in a conspiracist manner (i.e., conspiracy mentality). In Study 1, our results support the hypothesized links cross-sectionally and longitudinally on the subjective experience of hotter summer, except for climate change-related information exposure. In Study 2, we found only cross-sectional associations between the constructs, except for climate change-related information exposure. Lastly, we found mixed evidence regarding the moderating role of conspiracy mentality between the studies. Our findings provide initial support that climate change conspiracy beliefs are malleable to people's subjective experience of temperature anomalies. The happening of temperature anomalies could be a crucial opportunity for promoting scientific understanding of climate change. • The subjective experience of a hotter summer related to less climate change conspiracy beliefs. • We explored the mediating roles of perceived less psychological distance, stronger negative emotions, and more information exposure. • We observed longitudinal links in the U.S. and cross-sectional links in China. • Climate change conspiracy beliefs are malleable to people's subjective experiences.

Journal of Environmental PsychologyVol. 98
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK), Beijing Normal University (CN), University of Hong Kong (HK)
University Grants Committee, AXA Research Fund, Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee, Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
6.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.