Case studies using a simple airborne infection risk calculator to minimize COVID-19 infection risk: Common approaches and challenges

Following the recognition of the role of airborne transmission in the spread of SARS-CoV-2, the role of building ventilation in minimising indoor respiratory events has become of significant interest, with numerous risk assessment tools developed to understand infection risk in different indoor environments. To date there has been limited retrospective analysis of how such tools were applied to assess indoor infection risk and inform building occupancy during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this paper we document case studies from Australia and New Zealand using one such risk assessment tool, the Airborne Infection Risk Calculator (AIRC), and describe how the AIRC was used to assess COVID-19 risk in different indoor settings and how users customized the tool for their own purposes. While inherent uncertainties mean the AIRC model could not calculate the exact risk in any of the case studies, the model's framework enabled objective discussion about the role of ventilation in infection risk reduction and public health. Future use of tools such as the AIRC would be improved with development of policies or regulations that promote or require a standardized approach for this assessment, translation of improvement in ventilation in a room or building scale into overall public health benefits, and endorsement of such tools by Global and/or National health authorities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Building and Environment
Published
2024-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111957
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Infection Control and Ventilation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Case studies using a simple airborne infection risk calculator to minimize COVID-19 infection risk: Common approaches and challenges

Kathryn L. Linge, Mark Jermy, Lídia Morawska, Giorgio Buonanno et al.
1 citations
Building and Environment
Infection Control and Ventilation
0.42
article

Case studies using a simple airborne infection risk calculator to minimize COVID-19 infection risk: Common approaches and challenges

Kathryn L. Linge, Mark Jermy, Lídia Morawska, Giorgio Buonanno, Jason Chen, Alexander Mikszewski
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Following the recognition of the role of airborne transmission in the spread of SARS-CoV-2, the role of building ventilation in minimising indoor respiratory events has become of significant interest, with numerous risk assessment tools developed to understand infection risk in different indoor environments. To date there has been limited retrospective analysis of how such tools were applied to assess indoor infection risk and inform building occupancy during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this paper we document case studies from Australia and New Zealand using one such risk assessment tool, the Airborne Infection Risk Calculator (AIRC), and describe how the AIRC was used to assess COVID-19 risk in different indoor settings and how users customized the tool for their own purposes. While inherent uncertainties mean the AIRC model could not calculate the exact risk in any of the case studies, the model's framework enabled objective discussion about the role of ventilation in infection risk reduction and public health. Future use of tools such as the AIRC would be improved with development of policies or regulations that promote or require a standardized approach for this assessment, translation of improvement in ventilation in a room or building scale into overall public health benefits, and endorsement of such tools by Global and/or National health authorities.

Building and EnvironmentVol. 265
Queensland University of Technology (AU), University of Canterbury (NZ), Università degli studi di Cassino e del Lazio Meridionale (IT), ChemCentre (AU)
Queensland University of Technology, Curtin University of Technology, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, Ministry for Business Innovation and Employment, Canterbury District Health Board, Ministry of Education- New Zealand
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Infection Control and Ventilation
0.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.