Energy-Optimal Asymmetrical Gait Selection for Quadrupedal Robots

Symmetrical gaits, such as trotting, are commonly employed in quadrupedal robots for their simplicity and stability. However, the potential of asymmetrical gaits, such as bounding and galloping–which are prevalent in their natural counterparts at high speeds or over long distances–is less clear in the design of locomotion controllers for legged machines. This study systematically examines five distinct asymmetrical quadrupedal gaits on a legged robot, aiming to uncover the fundamental differences in footfall sequences and the consequent energetics across a broad range of speeds. Utilizing a full-body model of a quadrupedal robot (Unitree A1), we developed a hybrid system for each gait, incorporating the desired footfall sequence and rigid impacts. To identify the most energy-optimal gait, we applied optimal control methods, framing it as a trajectory optimization problem with specific constraints and a work-based cost of transport as an objective function. Our results show that, in the context of asymmetrical gaits, when minimizing cost of transport across the entire stride, the front leg pair primarily propels the system forward, while the rear leg pair acts more like an inverted pendulum, contributing significantly less to the energetic output. Additionally, while bounding–characterized by two aerial phases per cycle–is the most energy-optimal gait at higher speeds, the energy expenditure of gaits at speeds below 1 m/s depend heavily on the robot's specific design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
Published
2024-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/lra.2024.3443589
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Robotic Locomotion and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy-Optimal Asymmetrical Gait Selection for Quadrupedal Robots

Yasser G. Alqaham, Jing Cheng, Zhenyu Gan
4 citations
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
Robotic Locomotion and Control
0.74
article

Energy-Optimal Asymmetrical Gait Selection for Quadrupedal Robots

Yasser G. Alqaham, Jing Cheng, Zhenyu Gan
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Symmetrical gaits, such as trotting, are commonly employed in quadrupedal robots for their simplicity and stability. However, the potential of asymmetrical gaits, such as bounding and galloping–which are prevalent in their natural counterparts at high speeds or over long distances–is less clear in the design of locomotion controllers for legged machines. This study systematically examines five distinct asymmetrical quadrupedal gaits on a legged robot, aiming to uncover the fundamental differences in footfall sequences and the consequent energetics across a broad range of speeds. Utilizing a full-body model of a quadrupedal robot (Unitree A1), we developed a hybrid system for each gait, incorporating the desired footfall sequence and rigid impacts. To identify the most energy-optimal gait, we applied optimal control methods, framing it as a trajectory optimization problem with specific constraints and a work-based cost of transport as an objective function. Our results show that, in the context of asymmetrical gaits, when minimizing cost of transport across the entire stride, the front leg pair primarily propels the system forward, while the rear leg pair acts more like an inverted pendulum, contributing significantly less to the energetic output. Additionally, while bounding–characterized by two aerial phases per cycle–is the most energy-optimal gait at higher speeds, the energy expenditure of gaits at speeds below 1 m/s depend heavily on the robot's specific design.

IEEE Robotics and Automation LettersVol. 9(10)
Syracuse University (US)
Syracuse University
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Robotic Locomotion and Control
0.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.