Safety of Options to “Boost” (Enhancing Insulin Infusion Rates) and “Ease-Off” (Reducing Insulin Infusion Rates) in CamAPS FX Hybrid Closed-Loop System: A Real-World Analysis
The usage and safety of the Boost and Ease-off features in the CamAPS FX hybrid closed-loop system were analyzed in a retrospective analysis of real-world data from 7,464 users over a 12-month period. Boost was used more frequently than Ease-off, but for a shorter duration per use. Mean starting glucose was above range for Boost (229 ± 51 mg/dL), and within range for Ease-off (114 ± 29 mg/dL). Time spent below 70 mg/dL was low during Boost periods [median (interquartile range; IQR) 0.0% (0.0, 0.5%)], and lower than during no Boost periods [2.1% (1.2, 3.4%)], while time spent above 180 mg/dL was lower during Ease-off periods (15 ± 14%) compared with no Ease-off periods (25 ± 12%). There were no episodes of severe hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis attributed to Boost or Ease-off use. Boost and Ease-off allow users to engage safely with CamAPS FX to manage their glucose levels during periods of more-than-usual and less-than-usual insulin needs.
Authors
- Roman Hovorka (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2901-461X)
- Yue Ruan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3498-2543)
- Malgorzata E. Wilinska (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1564-8083)
- Charlotte K. Boughton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3272-9544)
- Judy Sibayan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9298-133X)
- Simon Bergford (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0213-7059)
- Peter Calhoun (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5325-7200)
- Chloë Royston
Institutions
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Wellcome/MRC Institute of Metabolic Science (GB)
- Jaeb Center for Health Research (US)
- Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
- Published
- 2024-08-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2024.0298
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Diabetes Management and Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.07
Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre