Carnap and Heidegger: Political antimetaphysics versus metaphysics as metapolitics

Rudolf Carnap and Martin Heidegger shared with Max Weber the decisionist understanding of values as something that cannot be justified by scientists or philosophers. Although both accepted the challenge of modernity in this respect, they reacted in opposite ways. Carnap, along with the Vienna Circle, defended a scientific conception of the world in which science and instrumental rationality were to permeate all of life; Heidegger embarked on an understanding of metaphysics in which rationality and science were to be eliminated. Both strategies were deeply political, and both resulted from the split in the German youth and life reform movement that took place during and immediately after World War I. I discuss this image here in the context of dialectical theology, the Vienna Circle, and the Davos Disputation, with a sideways glance at Ernst Cassirer, and with a view to earlier interpretations by Michael Friedman and Gottfried Gabriel.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geltung - Revista de Estudos das Origens da Filosofia Contemporânea
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23925/2764-0892.2024.v2.n2.e67407
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Philosophy, Science, and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carnap and Heidegger: Political antimetaphysics versus metaphysics as metapolitics

Christian Damböck
1 citations
Geltung - Revista de Estudos das Origens da Filosofia Contemporânea
Philosophy, Science, and History
6.04
article

Carnap and Heidegger: Political antimetaphysics versus metaphysics as metapolitics

Christian Damböck
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Rudolf Carnap and Martin Heidegger shared with Max Weber the decisionist understanding of values as something that cannot be justified by scientists or philosophers. Although both accepted the challenge of modernity in this respect, they reacted in opposite ways. Carnap, along with the Vienna Circle, defended a scientific conception of the world in which science and instrumental rationality were to permeate all of life; Heidegger embarked on an understanding of metaphysics in which rationality and science were to be eliminated. Both strategies were deeply political, and both resulted from the split in the German youth and life reform movement that took place during and immediately after World War I. I discuss this image here in the context of dialectical theology, the Vienna Circle, and the Davos Disputation, with a sideways glance at Ernst Cassirer, and with a view to earlier interpretations by Michael Friedman and Gottfried Gabriel.

Geltung - Revista de Estudos das Origens da Filosofia ContemporâneaVol. 2(2)
University of Vienna (AT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Philosophy, Science, and History
6.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Carnap and Heidegger: Political antimetaphysics versus metaphysics as metapolitics — Christian Damböck · Geltung - Revista de Estudos das Origens da Filosofia Contemporânea (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS