Philosophy versus the continental/analytic distinction
The distinction between analytic and continental philosophy is not a philosophical distinction. It is a sociological one, incorporating political and psychological dimensions. I shall argue that this distinction is a symptom of, most relevantly, professionalization, and that professionalization excludes philosophy. As a result, the only philosophically meaningful consequence that the analytic/continental distinction has is to alert us by conceptual contrast to what it is that we should concern ourselves with instead. This alternative focus is the a-professional contexts and features of actual philosophy. The analytic/continental distinction usefully points us to these as that to which the specific structure and disciplinary effects of this distinction are entirely irrelevant.
Authors
- Jeremy Barris (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9216-6216)
Institutions
- Marshall University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Geltung - Revista de Estudos das Origens da Filosofia Contemporânea
- Published
- 2024-08-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.23925/2764-0892.2024.v2.n2.e66317
- Primary Topic
- Philosophy, Science, and History
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00