Evaluating mobile mental health apps using the mobile application rating scale (MARS) in the U.S.

Objective The objectives of this study were to comprehensively review and evaluate the quality of mobile mental health apps using the MARS and to identify high-quality apps.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Mental Health
Published
2024-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/18387357.2024.2388680
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating mobile mental health apps using the mobile application rating scale (MARS) in the U.S.

Eyun‐Jung Ki, Da-young Kang, JooYoung Jang
8 citations
Advances in Mental Health
Digital Mental Health Interventions
3.28
article

Evaluating mobile mental health apps using the mobile application rating scale (MARS) in the U.S.

Eyun‐Jung Ki, Da-young Kang, JooYoung Jang
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Objective The objectives of this study were to comprehensively review and evaluate the quality of mobile mental health apps using the MARS and to identify high-quality apps.

Advances in Mental HealthVol. 23(2)
University of Alabama (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
3.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating mobile mental health apps using the mobile application rating scale (MARS) in the U.S. — Eyun‐Jung Ki, Da-young Kang, et al. · Advances in Mental Health (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS