Nanoporous Carbon Materials as Solid Contacts for Microneedle Ion-Selective Sensors

Continuous sensing of biomarkers, such as potassium ions or pH, in wearable patches requires miniaturization of ion-selective sensor electrodes. Such miniaturization can be achieved by using nanostructured carbon materials as solid contacts in microneedle-based ion-selective and reference electrodes. Here we compare three carbon materials as solid contacts: colloid-imprinted mesoporous (CIM) carbon microparticles with ∼24-28 nm mesopores, mesoporous carbon nanospheres with 3-9 nm mesopores, and Super P carbon black nanoparticles without internal porosity but with textural mesoporosity in particle aggregates. We compare the effects of carbon architecture and composition on specific capacitance of the material, on the ability to incorporate ion-selective membrane components in the pores, and on sensor performance. Functioning K<sup>+</sup> and H<sup>+</sup> ion-selective electrodes and reference electrodes were obtained with gold-coated stainless-steel microneedles using all three types of carbon. The sensors gave near-Nernstian responses in clinically relevant concentration ranges, were free of potentially detrimental water layers, and showed no response to O<sub>2</sub>. They all exhibited sufficiently low long-term potential drift values to permit calibration-free, continuous operation for close to 1 day. In spite of the different specific capacitances and pore architecture of the three types of carbon, no significant difference in potential stability for K<sup>+</sup> ion sensing was observed between electrodes that used each material. In the observed drift values, factors other than the carbon solid contact are likely to play a role, too. However, for pH sensing, electrodes with CIM as a carbon solid contact, which had the highest specific capacitance and best access to the pores, exhibited better long-term stability than electrodes with the other carbon materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Published
2024-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.4c07683
Citations
16
Primary Topic
Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.62

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nanoporous Carbon Materials as Solid Contacts for Microneedle Ion-Selective Sensors

Philippe Bühlmann, Sarah L. Swisher, Andreas Stein, Yevedzo E. Chipangura et al.
16 citations
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
4.62
article

Nanoporous Carbon Materials as Solid Contacts for Microneedle Ion-Selective Sensors

Philippe Bühlmann, Sarah L. Swisher, Andreas Stein, Yevedzo E. Chipangura, Vilma S. M. Brandao, Christopher Sedmak, Maria Komal, Jung Suk Choi
article en
16 citations

Abstract

Continuous sensing of biomarkers, such as potassium ions or pH, in wearable patches requires miniaturization of ion-selective sensor electrodes. Such miniaturization can be achieved by using nanostructured carbon materials as solid contacts in microneedle-based ion-selective and reference electrodes. Here we compare three carbon materials as solid contacts: colloid-imprinted mesoporous (CIM) carbon microparticles with ∼24-28 nm mesopores, mesoporous carbon nanospheres with 3-9 nm mesopores, and Super P carbon black nanoparticles without internal porosity but with textural mesoporosity in particle aggregates. We compare the effects of carbon architecture and composition on specific capacitance of the material, on the ability to incorporate ion-selective membrane components in the pores, and on sensor performance. Functioning K<sup>+</sup> and H<sup>+</sup> ion-selective electrodes and reference electrodes were obtained with gold-coated stainless-steel microneedles using all three types of carbon. The sensors gave near-Nernstian responses in clinically relevant concentration ranges, were free of potentially detrimental water layers, and showed no response to O<sub>2</sub>. They all exhibited sufficiently low long-term potential drift values to permit calibration-free, continuous operation for close to 1 day. In spite of the different specific capacitances and pore architecture of the three types of carbon, no significant difference in potential stability for K<sup>+</sup> ion sensing was observed between electrodes that used each material. In the observed drift values, factors other than the carbon solid contact are likely to play a role, too. However, for pH sensing, electrodes with CIM as a carbon solid contact, which had the highest specific capacitance and best access to the pores, exhibited better long-term stability than electrodes with the other carbon materials.

ACS Applied Materials & InterfacesVol. 16(34)
University of Minnesota (US)
University of Minnesota, College of Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
4.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.