Older adults do not show enhanced benefits from multisensory information on speeded perceptual discrimination tasks
Some research has shown that older adults benefit more from multisensory information than do young adults. However, more recent evidence has shown that the multisensory age benefit varies considerably across tasks. In the current study, older (65 - 80) and young (18 - 30) adults (N = 191) completed a speeded perceptual discrimination task either online or face-to-face to assess task response speed. We examined whether presenting stimuli in multiple sensory modalities (audio-visual) instead of one (audio-only or visual-only) benefits older adults more than young adults. Across all three experiments, a consistent speeding of response was found in the multisensory condition compared to the unisensory conditions for both young and older adults. Furthermore, race model analysis showed a significant multisensory benefit across a broad temporal interval. Critically, there were no significant differences between young and older adults. Taken together, these findings provide strong evidence in favour of a multisensory benefit that does not differ across age groups, contrasting with prior research.
Authors
- Christopher Atkin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5086-1173)
- Jemaine E. Stacey (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4035-712X)
- Katherine L. Roberts (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8735-2249)
- Stephen P. Badham (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6890-102X)
- Helen Henshaw (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0547-4403)
- Harriet A. Allen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3447-0137)
Institutions
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- NIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit (GB)
- Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (GB)
- Nottingham Trent University (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Neurobiology of Aging
- Published
- 2024-08-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2024.08.003
- Primary Topic
- Multisensory perception and integration
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Research Council for Economics, Humanities and Social Science
- NIHR BioResource
- Economic and Social Research Council
- NIHR Barts Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London