An intuitionistic interpretation of Bishop’s philosophy

Abstract The constructive mathematics developed by Bishop in Foundations of Constructive Analysis succeeded in gaining the attention of mathematicians, but discussions of its underlying philosophy are still rare in the literature. Commentators seem to conclude, from Bishop’s rejection of choice sequences and his severe criticism of Brouwerian intuitionism, that he is not an intuitionist–broadly understood as someone who maintains that mathematics is a mental creation, mathematics is meaningful and eludes formalization, mathematical objects are mind-dependent constructions given in intuition, and mathematical truths are experienceable. This paper develops and defends an intuitionistic interpretation of Bishop’s philosophical views.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophia Mathematica
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/philmat/nkae015
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.51
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An intuitionistic interpretation of Bishop’s philosophy

Bruno Bentzen
1 citations
Philosophia Mathematica
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
0.51
article

An intuitionistic interpretation of Bishop’s philosophy

Bruno Bentzen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The constructive mathematics developed by Bishop in Foundations of Constructive Analysis succeeded in gaining the attention of mathematicians, but discussions of its underlying philosophy are still rare in the literature. Commentators seem to conclude, from Bishop’s rejection of choice sequences and his severe criticism of Brouwerian intuitionism, that he is not an intuitionist–broadly understood as someone who maintains that mathematics is a mental creation, mathematics is meaningful and eludes formalization, mathematical objects are mind-dependent constructions given in intuition, and mathematical truths are experienceable. This paper develops and defends an intuitionistic interpretation of Bishop’s philosophical views.

Philosophia MathematicaVol. 32(3)
Zhejiang University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
0.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.