Two Approaches of ‘Proactive Consultation’: Towards Well-Functioning Clinical Ethics Consultation

In recent years, the global need for clinical ethics consultation services (CECS) has increased to address ethical challenges, dilemmas, and moral distress in clinical environments. In Japan, many hospitals have introduced CECS over the past decade, but few such services work effectively because of the small number of consultations. To address this, we propose two proactive ethics consultation methods: inter-professional ethics rounds and patient note reviews. This paper provides a detailed explanation of these methods, complete with scenarios based on actual cases. These methods can make CECS 'well-functioning' by shifting the starting points of consultation from consultees to CECS providers. We then examine the impact and value of proactive ethics consultation as well as four critical factors for its success including attitude, positioning, and competency of proactive consultation teams. We believe our suggestions will provide valuable insights for future clinical ethics consultations and stimulate academic debate about what constitutes a 'well-functioning' CECS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Bioethics Review
Published
2024-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-024-00302-8
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two Approaches of ‘Proactive Consultation’: Towards Well-Functioning Clinical Ethics Consultation

Atsushi Kogetsu, Jungen Koimizu
Asian Bioethics Review
Ethics in medical practice
article

Two Approaches of ‘Proactive Consultation’: Towards Well-Functioning Clinical Ethics Consultation

Atsushi Kogetsu, Jungen Koimizu
article en

Abstract

In recent years, the global need for clinical ethics consultation services (CECS) has increased to address ethical challenges, dilemmas, and moral distress in clinical environments. In Japan, many hospitals have introduced CECS over the past decade, but few such services work effectively because of the small number of consultations. To address this, we propose two proactive ethics consultation methods: inter-professional ethics rounds and patient note reviews. This paper provides a detailed explanation of these methods, complete with scenarios based on actual cases. These methods can make CECS 'well-functioning' by shifting the starting points of consultation from consultees to CECS providers. We then examine the impact and value of proactive ethics consultation as well as four critical factors for its success including attitude, positioning, and competency of proactive consultation teams. We believe our suggestions will provide valuable insights for future clinical ethics consultations and stimulate academic debate about what constitutes a 'well-functioning' CECS.

Asian Bioethics ReviewVol. 17(1)
Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine (JP), Japanese Red Cross Society Kyoto Daini Hospital (JP), The University of Osaka (JP)
Osaka University
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Ethics in medical practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Two Approaches of ‘Proactive Consultation’: Towards Well-Functioning Clinical Ethics Consultation — Atsushi Kogetsu, Jungen Koimizu · Asian Bioethics Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS