Geospatial techno-economic and environmental assessment of different energy options for solid sorbent direct air capture

Summary: Direct air capture (DAC) is a promising carbon dioxide removal technology, but its effectiveness hinges on access to cheap, low-carbon energy. Here, we present a spatial techno-economic and environmental assessment of the coupling of solid sorbent DAC with different energy sources. We found that the most cost- and energy-efficient option is to couple DAC with thermal power plants, e.g., nuclear and natural gas combined cycle with carbon capture. These two options have a gross levelized cost of DAC (LCODgross) starting at $246–$503 and $314–$557 per tCO2, respectively, for different regions. For renewable energy and energy storage options, regions with good solar irradiation can achieve low LCODgross, at $319 per tCO2 when utilizing concentrated solar power, whereas regions with low solar irradiation are unsuitable for this option due to the high cost and large land requirement. Achieving an LCODgross of ≤$200 per tCO2 would require significant improvements in the current technology. Science for society: Cost-effective transition pathways to keep global temperature rise below 2°C require billions of tons of CO2 removal from the atmosphere annually. Direct air capture (DAC) offers advantages like permanent storage of CO2 with low land use but it is energy-intensive. Thus, sustainable and cost-effective large-scale DAC deployment needs optimal site identification for cheap, low-carbon energy and regional co-benefit maximization. This study presents a global assessment of DAC energy supply options, including conventional and renewable energy sources, considering region-specific factors. Our analysis identifies the most suitable energy supply options for different regions, assessed based on techno-economic and environmental performance and potential co-benefits. The results help provide a foundation of evidence that will be essential for developing business models, strategies, and policies for the sustainable and cost-effective large-scale deployment of DAC systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cell Reports Sustainability
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsus.2024.100151
Citations
17
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geospatial techno-economic and environmental assessment of different energy options for solid sorbent direct air capture

Niall Mac Dowell, Marwan Sendi, Paul S. Fennell, Mai Bui
17 citations
Cell Reports Sustainability
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
3.61
article

Geospatial techno-economic and environmental assessment of different energy options for solid sorbent direct air capture

Niall Mac Dowell, Marwan Sendi, Paul S. Fennell, Mai Bui
article en
17 citations

Abstract

Summary: Direct air capture (DAC) is a promising carbon dioxide removal technology, but its effectiveness hinges on access to cheap, low-carbon energy. Here, we present a spatial techno-economic and environmental assessment of the coupling of solid sorbent DAC with different energy sources. We found that the most cost- and energy-efficient option is to couple DAC with thermal power plants, e.g., nuclear and natural gas combined cycle with carbon capture. These two options have a gross levelized cost of DAC (LCODgross) starting at $246–$503 and $314–$557 per tCO2, respectively, for different regions. For renewable energy and energy storage options, regions with good solar irradiation can achieve low LCODgross, at $319 per tCO2 when utilizing concentrated solar power, whereas regions with low solar irradiation are unsuitable for this option due to the high cost and large land requirement. Achieving an LCODgross of ≤$200 per tCO2 would require significant improvements in the current technology. Science for society: Cost-effective transition pathways to keep global temperature rise below 2°C require billions of tons of CO2 removal from the atmosphere annually. Direct air capture (DAC) offers advantages like permanent storage of CO2 with low land use but it is energy-intensive. Thus, sustainable and cost-effective large-scale DAC deployment needs optimal site identification for cheap, low-carbon energy and regional co-benefit maximization. This study presents a global assessment of DAC energy supply options, including conventional and renewable energy sources, considering region-specific factors. Our analysis identifies the most suitable energy supply options for different regions, assessed based on techno-economic and environmental performance and potential co-benefits. The results help provide a foundation of evidence that will be essential for developing business models, strategies, and policies for the sustainable and cost-effective large-scale deployment of DAC systems.

Cell Reports SustainabilityVol. 1(8)
Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
3.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.