Optimizing Human–AI Collaboration in Chemistry: A Case Study on Enhancing Generative AI Responses through Prompt Engineering

“Are we asking the right questions?” seems cliché, but for ChatGPT, it is a pivotal tool to ensure the accuracy of responses. While ChatGPT-3.5’s training on the vast database promises to revolutionize STEM education and research, this investigation shows the importance of precise communication and prompt engineering in guiding ChatGPT-3.5 toward reliable and accurate responses, particularly in chemistry. For instance, emphasizing context, clearly defining symbols, and focusing on field-specific instructions can dramatically improve its performance. Furthermore, avoiding open-ended prompts and strategically using repetition can further enhance its accuracy. The iterative prompt design, demonstrated through a series of adjustments, illustrates how seemingly minor refinements, such as substituting “least” for “lowest”, profoundly impact the output. This study highlights the essential role of human oversight, including the construction of well-crafted prompts, in guarding reliable information and nurturing a productive “Human–AI” (HAI) partnership.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemistry
Published
2024-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry6040043
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Biomedical and Engineering Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing Human–AI Collaboration in Chemistry: A Case Study on Enhancing Generative AI Responses through Prompt Engineering

Dinesh V. Vidhani, Manoharan Mariappan
7 citations
Chemistry
Biomedical and Engineering Education
1.29
article

Optimizing Human–AI Collaboration in Chemistry: A Case Study on Enhancing Generative AI Responses through Prompt Engineering

Dinesh V. Vidhani, Manoharan Mariappan
article en
7 citations

Abstract

“Are we asking the right questions?” seems cliché, but for ChatGPT, it is a pivotal tool to ensure the accuracy of responses. While ChatGPT-3.5’s training on the vast database promises to revolutionize STEM education and research, this investigation shows the importance of precise communication and prompt engineering in guiding ChatGPT-3.5 toward reliable and accurate responses, particularly in chemistry. For instance, emphasizing context, clearly defining symbols, and focusing on field-specific instructions can dramatically improve its performance. Furthermore, avoiding open-ended prompts and strategically using repetition can further enhance its accuracy. The iterative prompt design, demonstrated through a series of adjustments, illustrates how seemingly minor refinements, such as substituting “least” for “lowest”, profoundly impact the output. This study highlights the essential role of human oversight, including the construction of well-crafted prompts, in guarding reliable information and nurturing a productive “Human–AI” (HAI) partnership.

ChemistryVol. 6(4)
Miami Dade College (US), Florida College (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Biomedical and Engineering Education
1.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.