CONCLUSION OF A FIXED-TERM EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT: RIGHT OR OBLIGATION?

This paper explores the legal intricacies of fixed-term employment contracts within the context of Uzbekistan’s labor laws, particularly focusing on the differences between the Labor Codes of 1995 and 2022. The study examines whether the grounds provided in the legislation for employers to conclude fixed-term contracts are rights or obligations. The analysis reveals that the 1995 Labor Code restricts employers’ rights to conclude fixed-term employment contracts under certain conditions, suggesting that in some cases, entering into a fixed-term contract is not merely a right but an obligation. The paper also discusses relevant judicial practices, including case studies, to illustrate how these legal principles are applied in practice. The findings highlight the need for clear legal guidelines to protect both employers’ and employees’ rights while ensuring compliance with labor laws.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/volume06issue08-03
Primary Topic
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CONCLUSION OF A FIXED-TERM EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT: RIGHT OR OBLIGATION?

Bonu Rakhimberganova
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
article

CONCLUSION OF A FIXED-TERM EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT: RIGHT OR OBLIGATION?

Bonu Rakhimberganova
article en

Abstract

This paper explores the legal intricacies of fixed-term employment contracts within the context of Uzbekistan’s labor laws, particularly focusing on the differences between the Labor Codes of 1995 and 2022. The study examines whether the grounds provided in the legislation for employers to conclude fixed-term contracts are rights or obligations. The analysis reveals that the 1995 Labor Code restricts employers’ rights to conclude fixed-term employment contracts under certain conditions, suggesting that in some cases, entering into a fixed-term contract is not merely a right but an obligation. The paper also discusses relevant judicial practices, including case studies, to illustrate how these legal principles are applied in practice. The findings highlight the need for clear legal guidelines to protect both employers’ and employees’ rights while ensuring compliance with labor laws.

The American Journal of Political Science Law and CriminologyVol. 6(8)
Tashkent State University of Law (UZ)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

CONCLUSION OF A FIXED-TERM EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT: RIGHT OR OBLIGATION? — Bonu Rakhimberganova · The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS