The evolution of selection bias in the recent epidemiologic literature—a selective overview

Selection bias has long been central in methodological discussions across epidemiology and other fields. In epidemiology, the concept of selection bias has been continually evolving over time. In this issue of American Journal of Epidemiology, Mathur and Shpitser (Am J Epidemiol. 2025;194(1):267-277) present simple graphical rules for assessing the presence of selection bias when estimating causal effects by using a single-world intervention graph (SWIG). Their work is particularly insightful as it addresses the scenarios where treatment affects sample selection-a topic that has been underexplored in previous literature on selection bias. To contextualize the work by Mathur and Shpitser, we trace the evolution of the concept of selection bias in epidemiology, focusing primarily on the developments in the last 20-30 years following the adoption of causal directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) in epidemiologic research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2024-08-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae282
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The evolution of selection bias in the recent epidemiologic literature—a selective overview

Chanelle J. Howe, Gregg Gonsalves, Haidong Lu, Daniel Westreich et al.
7 citations
American Journal of Epidemiology
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
4.25
article

The evolution of selection bias in the recent epidemiologic literature—a selective overview

Chanelle J. Howe, Gregg Gonsalves, Haidong Lu, Daniel Westreich, Paul N. Zivich
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Selection bias has long been central in methodological discussions across epidemiology and other fields. In epidemiology, the concept of selection bias has been continually evolving over time. In this issue of American Journal of Epidemiology, Mathur and Shpitser (Am J Epidemiol. 2025;194(1):267-277) present simple graphical rules for assessing the presence of selection bias when estimating causal effects by using a single-world intervention graph (SWIG). Their work is particularly insightful as it addresses the scenarios where treatment affects sample selection-a topic that has been underexplored in previous literature on selection bias. To contextualize the work by Mathur and Shpitser, we trace the evolution of the concept of selection bias in epidemiology, focusing primarily on the developments in the last 20-30 years following the adoption of causal directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) in epidemiologic research.

American Journal of EpidemiologyVol. 194(3)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Brown University (US), Yale University (US), Yale New Haven Health System (US), Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (US)
National Institutes of Health
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
4.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The evolution of selection bias in the recent epidemiologic literature—a selective overview — Chanelle J. Howe, Gregg Gonsalves, et al. · American Journal of Epidemiology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS