Characterisation of T<sub>1</sub> (Al<sub>2</sub>CuLi) Precipitates in Conventional (2099-T83) and Laser Additive Manufactured (PBF-LB/M, DED-LB/M) Microstructures

Abstract The high strength and lightweight benefits of Al-Cu-Li alloys make them attractive for aerospace applications. The major strength contributing phase is the T 1 (Al 2 CuLi) phase. Although extensive reporting is known on its nucleation behaviour and structure in conventional T 1 microstructures, little is known for additive manufacturing (AM). This work focusses on the comparative characterisation of T 1 phase (structure, nucleation behaviour) in conventional (2099-T83), Powder Bed Fusion (PBF-LB/M) and Direct Energy Deposition (DED-LB/M) AA2099 microstructures. It is shown that with different AM processes and heat treatments, different T 1 microstructures are achievable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1310/1/012003
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterisation of T1 (Al2CuLi) Precipitates in Conventional (2099-T83) and Laser Additive Manufactured (PBF-LB/M, DED-LB/M) Microstructures

Iris Raffeis, Narottam P. Bansal, Chijioke Kenneth Akuata, Frank Adjei-Kyeremeh et al.
IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

Characterisation of T1 (Al2CuLi) Precipitates in Conventional (2099-T83) and Laser Additive Manufactured (PBF-LB/M, DED-LB/M) Microstructures

Iris Raffeis, Narottam P. Bansal, Chijioke Kenneth Akuata, Frank Adjei-Kyeremeh, S Zischke, A. Polaczek
article en

Abstract

Abstract The high strength and lightweight benefits of Al-Cu-Li alloys make them attractive for aerospace applications. The major strength contributing phase is the T 1 (Al 2 CuLi) phase. Although extensive reporting is known on its nucleation behaviour and structure in conventional T 1 microstructures, little is known for additive manufacturing (AM). This work focusses on the comparative characterisation of T 1 phase (structure, nucleation behaviour) in conventional (2099-T83), Powder Bed Fusion (PBF-LB/M) and Direct Energy Deposition (DED-LB/M) AA2099 microstructures. It is shown that with different AM processes and heat treatments, different T 1 microstructures are achievable.

IOP Conference Series Materials Science and EngineeringVol. 1310(1)
RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Characterisation of T<sub>1</sub> (Al<sub>2</sub>CuLi) Precipitates in Conventional (2099-T83) and Laser Additive Manufactured (PBF-LB/M, DED-LB/M) Microstructures — Iris Raffeis, Narottam P. Bansal, et al. · IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS