Tumor necrosis factor alpha and milk fat globule-epidermal growth factor 8: Novel biomarkers to predict implantation failure and pregnancy loss

Objective To determinate whether implantation failure (IF) and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) can be predicted in serum prior to in vitro fertilization (IVF)?. Design Multicentric prospective controlled pilot clinical study from January 2016 to January 2020. Material and methods Thirty women ages 21-35 years were recruited from 3 groups: fertile controls (C), unexplained IF (following 3 failed good quality embryo transfers), and RPL (at least 2 unexplained first trimester miscarriages) in their natural cycle in which serum tumor necrosis factor (TNFα) and milk fat globule-epidermal growth factor 8 (MFG-E8) estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) levels were quantified in the early proliferative (cycle day 2) and secretory phases (urinary luteinizing hormone (LH)+7 days). Additionally, an endometrial biopsy was obtained on urinary LH+7 days for MFG-E8 and TNF α protein and gene expression analysis. Results Ten women were assigned to each group. No statistical differences were found in age, body mass index, antimullerian hormone, baseline follicle stimulating hormone and baseline antral follicle count among cohorts. Mean serum E2 and P4 levels were similar among all groups in both the proliferative and secretory phases: E2 proliferative (C 69.19±26.64 pg/ml, IF 64.19±32.56 pg/ml, RPL proliferative 57.44±38.51; p= 0.55), E2 secretory (C 164.10±52.57 pg/ml, IF 172.57±121, RPL 173.81±.97.35; p=0.25), P4 proliferative (C 0.45±0.15 ng/ml, IF 0.45±0.19 ng/ml, RPL 0.53±0.18 ng/ml; p=0.85), P4 secretory (C 7.42±4.06 ng/ml, IF 7.8±4.56 ng/ml, RPL 8.05±4.38 ng/ml; p= 0.74). Mean serum TNFα levels were significantly higher in both, the proliferative and secretory phases for the RPL group (proliferative RPL 9.98±4.47 pg/ml, IF 4.73±2.56 pg/ml, C 3.42±1.01 pg/ml; p=0.001 vs secretory RPL 8.67±4.45 pg/ml, C 3.35±0.94 pg/ml, IF 3.85±1.01 pg/ml; p= 0.03). Mean serum MFG-E8 levels were significantly higher in the IF group during the proliferative phase (IF 373±201 pg/ml, RPL 201±115 pg/ml, C 225.58±109.73pg/ml; p=0.03), but not in the secretory phase (IF 237±101 pg/ml, RPL 189±116 pg/ml, C 199.41±112.43 pg/ml; p=0.15). Endometrial MFG-E8 mRNA levels were significantly lower in the IF and RPL group compared to C (p=0.03). TNFα mRNA levels were not statistically significant among groups (p=0.12). Conclusions TNFα and MFG-E8 serum levels may serve as serum markers to predict IF and RPL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Reproduction
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58779/issn.2954-467x.tjor2024.v2.n4.58
Primary Topic
Reproductive System and Pregnancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tumor necrosis factor alpha and milk fat globule-epidermal growth factor 8: Novel biomarkers to predict implantation failure and pregnancy loss

Tamar Alkon‐Meadows
The Journal of Reproduction
Reproductive System and Pregnancy
article

Tumor necrosis factor alpha and milk fat globule-epidermal growth factor 8: Novel biomarkers to predict implantation failure and pregnancy loss

Tamar Alkon‐Meadows
article en

Abstract

Objective To determinate whether implantation failure (IF) and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) can be predicted in serum prior to in vitro fertilization (IVF)?. Design Multicentric prospective controlled pilot clinical study from January 2016 to January 2020. Material and methods Thirty women ages 21-35 years were recruited from 3 groups: fertile controls (C), unexplained IF (following 3 failed good quality embryo transfers), and RPL (at least 2 unexplained first trimester miscarriages) in their natural cycle in which serum tumor necrosis factor (TNFα) and milk fat globule-epidermal growth factor 8 (MFG-E8) estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) levels were quantified in the early proliferative (cycle day 2) and secretory phases (urinary luteinizing hormone (LH)+7 days). Additionally, an endometrial biopsy was obtained on urinary LH+7 days for MFG-E8 and TNF α protein and gene expression analysis. Results Ten women were assigned to each group. No statistical differences were found in age, body mass index, antimullerian hormone, baseline follicle stimulating hormone and baseline antral follicle count among cohorts. Mean serum E2 and P4 levels were similar among all groups in both the proliferative and secretory phases: E2 proliferative (C 69.19±26.64 pg/ml, IF 64.19±32.56 pg/ml, RPL proliferative 57.44±38.51; p= 0.55), E2 secretory (C 164.10±52.57 pg/ml, IF 172.57±121, RPL 173.81±.97.35; p=0.25), P4 proliferative (C 0.45±0.15 ng/ml, IF 0.45±0.19 ng/ml, RPL 0.53±0.18 ng/ml; p=0.85), P4 secretory (C 7.42±4.06 ng/ml, IF 7.8±4.56 ng/ml, RPL 8.05±4.38 ng/ml; p= 0.74). Mean serum TNFα levels were significantly higher in both, the proliferative and secretory phases for the RPL group (proliferative RPL 9.98±4.47 pg/ml, IF 4.73±2.56 pg/ml, C 3.42±1.01 pg/ml; p=0.001 vs secretory RPL 8.67±4.45 pg/ml, C 3.35±0.94 pg/ml, IF 3.85±1.01 pg/ml; p= 0.03). Mean serum MFG-E8 levels were significantly higher in the IF group during the proliferative phase (IF 373±201 pg/ml, RPL 201±115 pg/ml, C 225.58±109.73pg/ml; p=0.03), but not in the secretory phase (IF 237±101 pg/ml, RPL 189±116 pg/ml, C 199.41±112.43 pg/ml; p=0.15). Endometrial MFG-E8 mRNA levels were significantly lower in the IF and RPL group compared to C (p=0.03). TNFα mRNA levels were not statistically significant among groups (p=0.12). Conclusions TNFα and MFG-E8 serum levels may serve as serum markers to predict IF and RPL.

The Journal of Reproduction
Reproductive Medicine Associates of New York (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Reproductive System and Pregnancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.