Going Against the Grain: Climate Change as a Wedge Issue for the Radical Right

Political parties often mobilise issues that can improve their electoral fortunes by splitting existing coalitions. We argue that by adopting a distinctively adversarial stance, radical right-wing parties have increasingly politicised climate change policies as a wedge issue. This strategy challenges the mainstream party consensus and seeks to mobilise voter concerns over green initiatives. Relying on state-of-the-art multilingual large language models, we empirically examine nearly half a million press releases from 76 political parties across nine European democracies to support this argument. Our findings demonstrate that the radical right’s oppositional climate policy rhetoric diverges significantly from the mainstream consensus. Survey data further reveal climate policy scepticism among voters across the political spectrum, highlighting the mobilising potential of climate policies as a wedge issue. This research advances our understanding of issue competition and the politicisation of climate change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Political Studies
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140241271297
Citations
42
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
93.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Going Against the Grain: Climate Change as a Wedge Issue for the Radical Right

Z. Dickson, SARA BINZER HOBOLT
42 citations
Comparative Political Studies
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
93.71
article

Going Against the Grain: Climate Change as a Wedge Issue for the Radical Right

Z. Dickson, SARA BINZER HOBOLT
article en
42 citations

Abstract

Political parties often mobilise issues that can improve their electoral fortunes by splitting existing coalitions. We argue that by adopting a distinctively adversarial stance, radical right-wing parties have increasingly politicised climate change policies as a wedge issue. This strategy challenges the mainstream party consensus and seeks to mobilise voter concerns over green initiatives. Relying on state-of-the-art multilingual large language models, we empirically examine nearly half a million press releases from 76 political parties across nine European democracies to support this argument. Our findings demonstrate that the radical right’s oppositional climate policy rhetoric diverges significantly from the mainstream consensus. Survey data further reveal climate policy scepticism among voters across the political spectrum, highlighting the mobilising potential of climate policies as a wedge issue. This research advances our understanding of issue competition and the politicisation of climate change.

Comparative Political StudiesVol. 58(8)
London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Volkswagen Foundation, European University Institute
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
93.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.