How Threat Mobilizes the Resurgence and Persistence of US White Supremacist Activism: The 1980s to the Present

Despite a centuries-long history of violent mobilization, white supremacist activism (WSA) has received relatively little sociological attention outside a small, specialized subfield. Disciplinary interest began to change after Trump's 2016 election; the 2017 violent attack in Charlottesville, Virginia; and the January 6, 2021, insurrection. In recognition, this review article focuses on what has been learned about contemporary WSA since the 1980s. We categorize studies by their unit of analysis—individual or micro, meso, and macro levels—to highlight analytic commonalities and distinctions and to underscore the central role that threat plays in the ebb and flow of WSA. As part of our discussion, we also point to unresolved and understudied issues. We conclude by identifying issues that future research should address.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Sociology
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-031021-112151
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Social and Cultural Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Threat Mobilizes the Resurgence and Persistence of US White Supremacist Activism: The 1980s to the Present

Adam Burston, Pete Simi, Robert Futrell
10 citations
Annual Review of Sociology
Social and Cultural Dynamics
11.32
article

How Threat Mobilizes the Resurgence and Persistence of US White Supremacist Activism: The 1980s to the Present

Adam Burston, Pete Simi, Robert Futrell
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Despite a centuries-long history of violent mobilization, white supremacist activism (WSA) has received relatively little sociological attention outside a small, specialized subfield. Disciplinary interest began to change after Trump's 2016 election; the 2017 violent attack in Charlottesville, Virginia; and the January 6, 2021, insurrection. In recognition, this review article focuses on what has been learned about contemporary WSA since the 1980s. We categorize studies by their unit of analysis—individual or micro, meso, and macro levels—to highlight analytic commonalities and distinctions and to underscore the central role that threat plays in the ebb and flow of WSA. As part of our discussion, we also point to unresolved and understudied issues. We conclude by identifying issues that future research should address.

Annual Review of SociologyVol. 50(1)
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US), University of California, Santa Barbara (US), Chapman University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Social and Cultural Dynamics
11.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.