Mitigating Climate Change via the Demand Side and Behavioral Insights: Policy Recommendation and Current Challenges

Applying behavioral insights for climate-change mitigation has both potential and pitfalls. Drawing upon IPCC insights on the potential of demand-side mitigation of various sectors, actors, and regions, three arguments address the role of the behavioral sciences. First, behavioral insights have heterogeneous effects, rendering the question of their average contribution meaningless. Second, many effects from behavioral science are found outside of the academic literature, so these relevant indicators of effectiveness do not inform the debate. Third, mitigation impact depends on scaling, which provides unique challenges for behavioral science because the research and application settings are often markedly different. Due to these challenges, policymakers should proceed with caution and apply behavioral insights with a careful case-by-case analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23727322241275147
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mitigating Climate Change via the Demand Side and Behavioral Insights: Policy Recommendation and Current Challenges

Sebastian Berger, Viktoria Cologna, Jan Michael Bauer
2 citations
Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
0.20
article

Mitigating Climate Change via the Demand Side and Behavioral Insights: Policy Recommendation and Current Challenges

Sebastian Berger, Viktoria Cologna, Jan Michael Bauer
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Applying behavioral insights for climate-change mitigation has both potential and pitfalls. Drawing upon IPCC insights on the potential of demand-side mitigation of various sectors, actors, and regions, three arguments address the role of the behavioral sciences. First, behavioral insights have heterogeneous effects, rendering the question of their average contribution meaningless. Second, many effects from behavioral science are found outside of the academic literature, so these relevant indicators of effectiveness do not inform the debate. Third, mitigation impact depends on scaling, which provides unique challenges for behavioral science because the research and application settings are often markedly different. Due to these challenges, policymakers should proceed with caution and apply behavioral insights with a careful case-by-case analysis.

Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain SciencesVol. 11(2)
University of Bern (CH), Copenhagen Business School (DK), University of Zurich (CH), ETH Zurich (CH)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
0.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.