Methods for assessment of Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test performance in memory clinic patients and healthy adults - at the cross-roads of learning theory and clinical utility

<b>Background:</b> Knowledge is still lacking regarding the preferred method for evaluation of learning in the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT). Validity of different methods was examined by the effect size in differentiating diagnostic stages in memory clinic patients versus healthy adults and the strength of association between RAVLT performance and brain atrophy. <b>Method:</b> The study included individuals with dementia (<i>n</i> = 247), Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI, <i>n</i> = 709), Subjective Cognitive Impairment (SCI, <i>n</i> = 175) and cognitively unimpaired adults serving as healthy controls (HC, <i>n</i> = 102). All patients went through a comprehensive clinical examination and neuropsychological assessment of cognition including episodic memory gauged with RAVLT and brain imaging of medial temporal atrophy, cortical atrophy, and white matter hyperintensity. <b>Results:</b> The standard method for evaluation of learning in RAVLT (summed score over five trials) together with the late learning method (mean of trials 4 and 5) were the two most powerful methods according to group differentiation (discriminant validity). Both methods also showed considerable association with medial temporal atrophy (construct validity). The initial RAVLT performance represented by results on trial 1 and the constant in regression analysis with the power function provided information regarding attention that was important for the separation of SCI and HC. <b>Conclusions:</b> The most favorable clinical utility was indicated by discriminant and construct validity by total learning (standard method) including both attention- and learning-related parts and late learning of RAVLT performance, while theoretical understanding of mental processes involved in RAVLT performance was provided by the distinction between initial versus the subsequent learning performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Clinical Neuropsychologist
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2024.2384616
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methods for assessment of Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test performance in memory clinic patients and healthy adults - at the cross-roads of learning theory and clinical utility

Anna Rennie, Urban Ekman, John Wallert, Eric Westman et al.
4 citations
The Clinical Neuropsychologist
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
1.37
article

Methods for assessment of Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test performance in memory clinic patients and healthy adults - at the cross-roads of learning theory and clinical utility

Anna Rennie, Urban Ekman, John Wallert, Eric Westman, Ove Almkvist
article en
4 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Knowledge is still lacking regarding the preferred method for evaluation of learning in the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT). Validity of different methods was examined by the effect size in differentiating diagnostic stages in memory clinic patients versus healthy adults and the strength of association between RAVLT performance and brain atrophy. <b>Method:</b> The study included individuals with dementia (<i>n</i> = 247), Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI, <i>n</i> = 709), Subjective Cognitive Impairment (SCI, <i>n</i> = 175) and cognitively unimpaired adults serving as healthy controls (HC, <i>n</i> = 102). All patients went through a comprehensive clinical examination and neuropsychological assessment of cognition including episodic memory gauged with RAVLT and brain imaging of medial temporal atrophy, cortical atrophy, and white matter hyperintensity. <b>Results:</b> The standard method for evaluation of learning in RAVLT (summed score over five trials) together with the late learning method (mean of trials 4 and 5) were the two most powerful methods according to group differentiation (discriminant validity). Both methods also showed considerable association with medial temporal atrophy (construct validity). The initial RAVLT performance represented by results on trial 1 and the constant in regression analysis with the power function provided information regarding attention that was important for the separation of SCI and HC. <b>Conclusions:</b> The most favorable clinical utility was indicated by discriminant and construct validity by total learning (standard method) including both attention- and learning-related parts and late learning of RAVLT performance, while theoretical understanding of mental processes involved in RAVLT performance was provided by the distinction between initial versus the subsequent learning performance.

The Clinical NeuropsychologistVol. 39(2)
Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Stockholm University (SE), Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB), King's College London (GB), Women's College Hospital (CA), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Stockholm Health Care Services (SE), Cognitive Neuroimaging Lab (FR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
1.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.