Generalizability of anti–SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence estimates to the Montréal pediatric population: a comparison between 2 weighting methods

Seroprevalence studies of SARS-CoV-2 infections often have been based on study populations with nonrandom and nonrepresentative samples, limiting the generalizability of their results. In this study, the representativity and the generalizability of the baseline estimate (data collected from October 16, 2020, to April 18, 2021) of a pediatric seroprevalence study based in Montréal were investigated. The change in the estimates of seroprevalence were compared between 2 different weighting methods: marginal standardization and raking. The target population was the general pediatric population of Montréal, based on 2016 Canadian census data. Study results show variation across the multiple weighting scenarios. Although both weighting methods performed similarly, each possesses its own strengths and weaknesses. However, raking was preferred for its capacity to simultaneously weight for multiple underrepresented study population characteristics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae276
Citations
1
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generalizability of anti–SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence estimates to the Montréal pediatric population: a comparison between 2 weighting methods

Mabel Carabalí, Bouchra Nasri, Kate Zinszer, Laura Pierce et al.
1 citations
American Journal of Epidemiology
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
0.39
article

Generalizability of anti–SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence estimates to the Montréal pediatric population: a comparison between 2 weighting methods

Mabel Carabalí, Bouchra Nasri, Kate Zinszer, Laura Pierce, Britt McKinnon, Katia Charland, Adrien Saucier
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Seroprevalence studies of SARS-CoV-2 infections often have been based on study populations with nonrandom and nonrepresentative samples, limiting the generalizability of their results. In this study, the representativity and the generalizability of the baseline estimate (data collected from October 16, 2020, to April 18, 2021) of a pediatric seroprevalence study based in Montréal were investigated. The change in the estimates of seroprevalence were compared between 2 different weighting methods: marginal standardization and raking. The target population was the general pediatric population of Montréal, based on 2016 Canadian census data. Study results show variation across the multiple weighting scenarios. Although both weighting methods performed similarly, each possesses its own strengths and weaknesses. However, raking was preferred for its capacity to simultaneously weight for multiple underrepresented study population characteristics.

American Journal of EpidemiologyVol. 194(4)
Université de Montréal (CA)
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
0.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Generalizability of anti–SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence estimates to the Montréal pediatric population: a comparison between 2 weighting methods — Mabel Carabalí, Bouchra Nasri, et al. · American Journal of Epidemiology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS