Hyperinelasticity. Part II: A stretch-based formulation

A generalisation of the hyperinelasticity modelling framework devised in Part I of this sequel is formulated here, by presenting a (principal) stretches-based hyperinelastic deformation energy function WF. This generalisation is based on the premise that the (principal) stretches λj may assume any arbitrary real-valued exponents, rather than being restricted to the prescriptive powers 2 and −2, as in principal invariants-based models. The motivation behind this extension is to reduce the overall number of model parameters and thereby increase the versatility of the application of the hyperinelasticity framework, as well as to provide a more universal model. The ensuing hyperinelastic model is then applied to a wide range of extant experimental datasets encompassing foams, glassy and semi-crystalline polymers, hydrogels and liquid crystal elastomers, over both elastic and inelastic deformation ranges including yield, softening and plateau, and hardening behaviours, under tensile and compressive deformations. Upon demonstrating the favourable simulation of the foregoing behaviours by the model, its application is then extended to account for other nuanced aspects of inelasticity such as the effects of rate of deformation, crystallinity volume and angle of printing in 3D printed lattice structures. This augmentation is done via devising a generalised modelling framework which allows for the incorporation of a generic tensorial (including rank zero scalar) field of inelasticity-inducing factors into the core model, resulting in the model parameters to evolve with an appropriate measure of the factor of interest; e.g., deformation rate, crystallinity volume ratio etc. The proposed modelling framework will be shown to capture these effects proficiently. Given the simplicity of this modelling approach, as essentially an extension in the application of hyperelasticity, its versatility of implementation, and the favourable capturing of both elastic and inelastic behaviours, the devised hyperinelasticity framework is presented for application to the large elastic and inelastic deformation of polymers and elastomers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids
Published
2024-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2024.105825
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Elasticity and Material Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hyperinelasticity. Part II: A stretch-based formulation

Afshin Anssari-Benam
6 citations
Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids
Elasticity and Material Modeling
1.11
article

Hyperinelasticity. Part II: A stretch-based formulation

Afshin Anssari-Benam
article en
6 citations

Abstract

A generalisation of the hyperinelasticity modelling framework devised in Part I of this sequel is formulated here, by presenting a (principal) stretches-based hyperinelastic deformation energy function WF. This generalisation is based on the premise that the (principal) stretches λj may assume any arbitrary real-valued exponents, rather than being restricted to the prescriptive powers 2 and −2, as in principal invariants-based models. The motivation behind this extension is to reduce the overall number of model parameters and thereby increase the versatility of the application of the hyperinelasticity framework, as well as to provide a more universal model. The ensuing hyperinelastic model is then applied to a wide range of extant experimental datasets encompassing foams, glassy and semi-crystalline polymers, hydrogels and liquid crystal elastomers, over both elastic and inelastic deformation ranges including yield, softening and plateau, and hardening behaviours, under tensile and compressive deformations. Upon demonstrating the favourable simulation of the foregoing behaviours by the model, its application is then extended to account for other nuanced aspects of inelasticity such as the effects of rate of deformation, crystallinity volume and angle of printing in 3D printed lattice structures. This augmentation is done via devising a generalised modelling framework which allows for the incorporation of a generic tensorial (including rank zero scalar) field of inelasticity-inducing factors into the core model, resulting in the model parameters to evolve with an appropriate measure of the factor of interest; e.g., deformation rate, crystallinity volume ratio etc. The proposed modelling framework will be shown to capture these effects proficiently. Given the simplicity of this modelling approach, as essentially an extension in the application of hyperelasticity, its versatility of implementation, and the favourable capturing of both elastic and inelastic behaviours, the devised hyperinelasticity framework is presented for application to the large elastic and inelastic deformation of polymers and elastomers.

Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of SolidsVol. 192
University of Portsmouth (GB)
Leverhulme Trust
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Elasticity and Material Modeling
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.