Extensions of Orders to a Power Set vs. Scores of Hesitant Fuzzy Elements: Points in Common of Two Parallel Theories

We deal with two apparently disparate theories. One of them studies extensions of orderings from a set to its power set. The other one defines suitable scores on hesitant fuzzy elements. We show that both theories have the same mathematical substrate. Thus, important possibility/impossibility results concerning criteria for extensions can be transferred to new results on scores. And conversely, conditions imposed a priori on scores can give rise to new extension criteria. This enhances and enriches both theories. We show examples of translations of classical results on extensions in the context of scores. Also, we state new results concerning the impossibility of finding a utility function representing some kind of extension order if some restrictions are imposed on the utility function considered as a score.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Axioms
Published
2024-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms13080549
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extensions of Orders to a Power Set vs. Scores of Hesitant Fuzzy Elements: Points in Common of Two Parallel Theories

Esteban Induráin, Ana Munárriz, Martin Sergio Sara
1 citations
Axioms
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
0.49
article

Extensions of Orders to a Power Set vs. Scores of Hesitant Fuzzy Elements: Points in Common of Two Parallel Theories

Esteban Induráin, Ana Munárriz, Martin Sergio Sara
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We deal with two apparently disparate theories. One of them studies extensions of orderings from a set to its power set. The other one defines suitable scores on hesitant fuzzy elements. We show that both theories have the same mathematical substrate. Thus, important possibility/impossibility results concerning criteria for extensions can be transferred to new results on scores. And conversely, conditions imposed a priori on scores can give rise to new extension criteria. This enhances and enriches both theories. We show examples of translations of classical results on extensions in the context of scores. Also, we state new results concerning the impossibility of finding a utility function representing some kind of extension order if some restrictions are imposed on the utility function considered as a score.

AxiomsVol. 13(8)
Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA) (ES)
European Regional Development Fund, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
0.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Extensions of Orders to a Power Set vs. Scores of Hesitant Fuzzy Elements: Points in Common of Two Parallel Theories — Esteban Induráin, Ana Munárriz, et al. · Axioms (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS