Standardization of scan protocols for RT CT simulator from different vendors using quantitative image quality technique

The level of change in the IQ ratio was significant (>0.6) when using IMR. The IQ ratio change was relatively low to moderate when using either iDose in CTp (0.1-0.5) or SAFIRE in CT<sub>s</sub> (0.1-0.6). SAFIRE-2 in CT<sub>s</sub> showed a closer match to the reference body protocol when compared to iDose-3 in CT<sub>p</sub>. In the brain protocol, iDose-3 in CT<sub>p</sub> could be matched to the low to moderate level of SAFIRE in CT<sub>s</sub>. The AUC of d' was highest when using IMR in CT<sub>p</sub> with lower CTDI<sub>vol</sub>, and SAFIRE in CT<sub>s</sub> performed better than iDose in CT<sub>p</sub> CONCLUSION: It is possible to use target-based IQ metrics to evaluate the performance of the system and operations across various scanners in a phantom. This can serve as an initial reference to convert clinical scanned protocols from one CT simulation scanner to another.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Published
2024-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14484
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Standardization of scan protocols for RT CT simulator from different vendors using quantitative image quality technique

Seng Boh Lim, Hsiang‐Chi Kuo, Usman Mahmood, Assen S. Kirov et al.
2 citations
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
0.37
article

Standardization of scan protocols for RT CT simulator from different vendors using quantitative image quality technique

Seng Boh Lim, Hsiang‐Chi Kuo, Usman Mahmood, Assen S. Kirov, Laura Cerviño, James Mechalakos, Cesar Della Biancia, Shih‐Chi Lin, Trevin Trotman
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The level of change in the IQ ratio was significant (>0.6) when using IMR. The IQ ratio change was relatively low to moderate when using either iDose in CTp (0.1-0.5) or SAFIRE in CT<sub>s</sub> (0.1-0.6). SAFIRE-2 in CT<sub>s</sub> showed a closer match to the reference body protocol when compared to iDose-3 in CT<sub>p</sub>. In the brain protocol, iDose-3 in CT<sub>p</sub> could be matched to the low to moderate level of SAFIRE in CT<sub>s</sub>. The AUC of d' was highest when using IMR in CT<sub>p</sub> with lower CTDI<sub>vol</sub>, and SAFIRE in CT<sub>s</sub> performed better than iDose in CT<sub>p</sub> CONCLUSION: It is possible to use target-based IQ metrics to evaluate the performance of the system and operations across various scanners in a phantom. This can serve as an initial reference to convert clinical scanned protocols from one CT simulation scanner to another.

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical PhysicsVol. 25(10)
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
0.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.