Markerless three-dimensional gait analysis in healthy older adults: test–retest reliability and measurement error

In older adults, gait analysis may detect changes that signal early disease states, yet challenges in biomechanical screening limit widespread use in clinical or community settings. Recently, a markerless method from multi-camera video data has become accessible, making screenings less challenging. This study evaluated the test-retest reliability and measurement error of markerless gait kinematics and kinetics in healthy older adults. Twenty-nine healthy older adults performed gait analysis on two occasions, at preferred walking speed, using their everyday clothes. Lower limb angles and moments were averaged from 8 gait cycles. Integrated pointwise indices [Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC<sub>A,K</sub>) and Standard Error of Measurement (SEM)] were calculated for curve data, as well as ICC<sub>A,K,</sub> and SEM [95 % confidence intervals] for selected peaks. Generally, kinematic ICCs were good (>0.75) and reasonably stable throughout the gait cycle, except for the hip kinematics during the swing phase in the sagittal plane and pelvis tilt and rotation. The integrated and peaks SEM were <2.4°. The reliability of kinetics was similar (ICC>0.75), except for the transverse hip moment and abduction peak, fluctuating more during the swing than through the stance phase. SEM were < 0.07Nm/Kg. In conclusion, these results showed good overall test-retest reliability for markerless gait kinematics and kinetics for the hip, knee, and ankle joints, moderate for the pelvis angles, and error levels of ≤5°, and SEM%≤5% for the sagittal plane. This supports this method's use in assessing gait in healthy older adults, including kinetics, for which reliability data from markerless systems is difficult to find reported.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biomechanics
Published
2024-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112280
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.16

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Markerless three-dimensional gait analysis in healthy older adults: test–retest reliability and measurement error

Sílvia Cabral, António Veloso, Vera Moniz-Pereira, Andreia Carvalho et al.
8 citations
Journal of Biomechanics
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
9.16
article

Markerless three-dimensional gait analysis in healthy older adults: test–retest reliability and measurement error

Sílvia Cabral, António Veloso, Vera Moniz-Pereira, Andreia Carvalho, Rita Fernandes, Ana Assunção, Jos Vanrenterghem
article en
8 citations

Abstract

In older adults, gait analysis may detect changes that signal early disease states, yet challenges in biomechanical screening limit widespread use in clinical or community settings. Recently, a markerless method from multi-camera video data has become accessible, making screenings less challenging. This study evaluated the test-retest reliability and measurement error of markerless gait kinematics and kinetics in healthy older adults. Twenty-nine healthy older adults performed gait analysis on two occasions, at preferred walking speed, using their everyday clothes. Lower limb angles and moments were averaged from 8 gait cycles. Integrated pointwise indices [Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC<sub>A,K</sub>) and Standard Error of Measurement (SEM)] were calculated for curve data, as well as ICC<sub>A,K,</sub> and SEM [95 % confidence intervals] for selected peaks. Generally, kinematic ICCs were good (>0.75) and reasonably stable throughout the gait cycle, except for the hip kinematics during the swing phase in the sagittal plane and pelvis tilt and rotation. The integrated and peaks SEM were <2.4°. The reliability of kinetics was similar (ICC>0.75), except for the transverse hip moment and abduction peak, fluctuating more during the swing than through the stance phase. SEM were < 0.07Nm/Kg. In conclusion, these results showed good overall test-retest reliability for markerless gait kinematics and kinetics for the hip, knee, and ankle joints, moderate for the pelvis angles, and error levels of ≤5°, and SEM%≤5% for the sagittal plane. This supports this method's use in assessing gait in healthy older adults, including kinetics, for which reliability data from markerless systems is difficult to find reported.

Journal of BiomechanicsVol. 174
University of Lisbon (PT), Universidade Politécnica de Lisboa (PT), Universidade Politécnica de Setúbal (PT), KU Leuven (BE)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
9.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.