Hyperspectral reflectance and machine learning for multi-site monitoring of cotton growth

• Successful hyperspectral-based models to predict leaf area, canopy cover, and chlorophyll content for cotton. • Comparison/testing of four methods of machine learning for hyperspectral-based models. • Assessment of potential applications of a hyperspectral platforms by convolving wavelengths to fit bands of the satellite. • Normalization of the processed hyperspectral data had little benefit over the original data. Hyperspectral measurements can help with rapid decision-making and collecting data across multiple locations. However, there are multiple data processing methods (Savisky-Golay [SG], first derivative [FD], and normalization) and analyses ( partial least squares regression [PLS], weighted k-nearest neighbor [KKNN], support vector machine [SVM], and random forest [RF]) that can be used to determine the best relationship between physical measurements and hyperspectral data. In the current study, FD was the best method for data processing and SVM was the best model for predicting average cotton ( Gossypium spp. Malvaceae ) height and nodes. However, the combination of FD and RF were best at predicting cotton leaf area index, canopy cover, and chlorophyll content across the growing season. Additionally, results from models developed by both SVM and RF were closely related to pseudo-CHIME satellite wavebands, where in-situ hyperspectral data were matched to the spectral resolutions of a future hyperspectral satellite. The information and results presented will aid producers and other members of the cotton industry to make rapid and meaningful decisions that could result in greater yield and sustainable intensification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Smart Agricultural Technology
Published
2024-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2024.100536
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hyperspectral reflectance and machine learning for multi-site monitoring of cotton growth

Travis W. Witt, Amanda J. Ashworth, Prasanna H. Gowda, Douglas R. Smith et al.
9 citations
Smart Agricultural Technology
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
4.13
article

Hyperspectral reflectance and machine learning for multi-site monitoring of cotton growth

Travis W. Witt, Amanda J. Ashworth, Prasanna H. Gowda, Douglas R. Smith, Gurjinder S. Baath, K. Colton Flynn, H.K. Chinmayi
article en
9 citations

Abstract

• Successful hyperspectral-based models to predict leaf area, canopy cover, and chlorophyll content for cotton. • Comparison/testing of four methods of machine learning for hyperspectral-based models. • Assessment of potential applications of a hyperspectral platforms by convolving wavelengths to fit bands of the satellite. • Normalization of the processed hyperspectral data had little benefit over the original data. Hyperspectral measurements can help with rapid decision-making and collecting data across multiple locations. However, there are multiple data processing methods (Savisky-Golay [SG], first derivative [FD], and normalization) and analyses ( partial least squares regression [PLS], weighted k-nearest neighbor [KKNN], support vector machine [SVM], and random forest [RF]) that can be used to determine the best relationship between physical measurements and hyperspectral data. In the current study, FD was the best method for data processing and SVM was the best model for predicting average cotton ( Gossypium spp. Malvaceae ) height and nodes. However, the combination of FD and RF were best at predicting cotton leaf area index, canopy cover, and chlorophyll content across the growing season. Additionally, results from models developed by both SVM and RF were closely related to pseudo-CHIME satellite wavebands, where in-situ hyperspectral data were matched to the spectral resolutions of a future hyperspectral satellite. The information and results presented will aid producers and other members of the cotton industry to make rapid and meaningful decisions that could result in greater yield and sustainable intensification.

Smart Agricultural TechnologyVol. 9
Agricultural Research Service (US), Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory (US)
Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
4.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.