Big Galaxies and Big Black Holes: The Massive Ends of the Local Stellar and Black Hole Mass Functions and the Implications for Nanohertz Gravitational Waves

Abstract We construct the z = 0 galaxy stellar mass function (GSMF) by combining the GSMF at stellar masses M * ≲ 10 11.3 M ⊙ from the census study of Leja et al. and the GSMF of massive galaxies at M * ≳ 10 11.5 M ⊙ from the volume-limited MASSIVE galaxy survey. To obtain a robust estimate of M * for local massive galaxies, we use MASSIVE galaxies with M * measured from detailed dynamical modeling or stellar population synthesis modeling (incorporating a bottom-heavy initial mass function) with high-quality spatially resolved spectroscopy. These two independent sets of M * agree to within ∼7%. Our new z = 0 GSMF has a higher amplitude at M * ≳ 10 11.5 M ⊙ than previous studies, alleviating prior concerns of a lack of mass growth in massive galaxies between z ∼ 1 and 0. We derive a local black hole mass function (BHMF) from this GSMF and the scaling relation of supermassive black holes (SMBHs) and galaxy masses. The inferred abundance of local SMBHs above ∼10 10 M ⊙ is consistent with the number of currently known systems. The predicted amplitude of the nanohertz stochastic gravitational-wave background is also consistent with the levels reported by Pulsar Timing Array teams. Our z = 0 GSMF therefore leads to concordant results in the high-mass regime of the local galaxy and SMBH populations and the gravitational-wave amplitude from merging SMBHs. An exception is that our BHMF yields a z = 0 SMBH mass density that is notably higher than the value estimated from quasars at higher redshifts.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal Letters
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ad66b8
Citations
21
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Big Galaxies and Big Black Holes: The Massive Ends of the Local Stellar and Black Hole Mass Functions and the Implications for Nanohertz Gravitational Waves

Emily R. Liepold, Chung‐Pei Ma
21 citations
The Astrophysical Journal Letters
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
6.96
article

Big Galaxies and Big Black Holes: The Massive Ends of the Local Stellar and Black Hole Mass Functions and the Implications for Nanohertz Gravitational Waves

Emily R. Liepold, Chung‐Pei Ma
article en
21 citations

Abstract

Abstract We construct the z = 0 galaxy stellar mass function (GSMF) by combining the GSMF at stellar masses M * ≲ 10 11.3 M ⊙ from the census study of Leja et al. and the GSMF of massive galaxies at M * ≳ 10 11.5 M ⊙ from the volume-limited MASSIVE galaxy survey. To obtain a robust estimate of M * for local massive galaxies, we use MASSIVE galaxies with M * measured from detailed dynamical modeling or stellar population synthesis modeling (incorporating a bottom-heavy initial mass function) with high-quality spatially resolved spectroscopy. These two independent sets of M * agree to within ∼7%. Our new z = 0 GSMF has a higher amplitude at M * ≳ 10 11.5 M ⊙ than previous studies, alleviating prior concerns of a lack of mass growth in massive galaxies between z ∼ 1 and 0. We derive a local black hole mass function (BHMF) from this GSMF and the scaling relation of supermassive black holes (SMBHs) and galaxy masses. The inferred abundance of local SMBHs above ∼10 10 M ⊙ is consistent with the number of currently known systems. The predicted amplitude of the nanohertz stochastic gravitational-wave background is also consistent with the levels reported by Pulsar Timing Array teams. Our z = 0 GSMF therefore leads to concordant results in the high-mass regime of the local galaxy and SMBH populations and the gravitational-wave amplitude from merging SMBHs. An exception is that our BHMF yields a z = 0 SMBH mass density that is notably higher than the value estimated from quasars at higher redshifts.

The Astrophysical Journal LettersVol. 971(2)
Adolph C. and Mary Sprague Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science, University of California Berkeley, Heising-Simons Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
6.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.