Loading Dose of Ceftazidime Needs to Be Increased in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Study to Evaluate Recommended Loading Dose with Pharmacokinetic Modelling

To rapidly achieve ceftazidime target concentrations, a 2 g loading dose (LD) is recommended before continuous infusion, but its adequacy in critically ill patients, given their unique pharmacokinetics, needs investigation. This study included patients from six ICUs in Saint-Etienne and Paris, France, who received continuous ceftazidime infusion with plasma concentration measurements. Using MONOLIX and R, a pharmacokinetic (PK) model was developed, and the literature on ICU patient PK models was reviewed. Simulations calculated the LD needed to reach a 60 mg/L target concentration and assessed ceftazidime exposure for various regimens. Among 86 patients with 223 samples, ceftazidime PK was best described by a one-compartment model with glomerular filtration rate explaining clearance variability. Typical clearance and volume of distribution were 4.45 L/h and 88 L, respectively. The literature median volume of distribution was 37.2 L. Simulations indicated that an LD higher than 2 g was needed to achieve 60 mg/L in 80% of patients, with a median LD of 4.9 g. Our model showed a 4 g LD followed by 6 g/day infusion reached effective concentrations within 1 h, while a 2 g LD caused an 18 h delay in achieving target steady state.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antibiotics
Published
2024-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13080756
Primary Topic
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Loading Dose of Ceftazidime Needs to Be Increased in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Study to Evaluate Recommended Loading Dose with Pharmacokinetic Modelling

Benjamin Kably, Sophie Perinel-Ragey, Félicien Le Louedec, Guillaume Thiéry et al.
Antibiotics
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
article

Loading Dose of Ceftazidime Needs to Be Increased in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Study to Evaluate Recommended Loading Dose with Pharmacokinetic Modelling

Benjamin Kably, Sophie Perinel-Ragey, Félicien Le Louedec, Guillaume Thiéry, Édouard Ollier, Manon Launay, Julien Lanoiselée
article en

Abstract

To rapidly achieve ceftazidime target concentrations, a 2 g loading dose (LD) is recommended before continuous infusion, but its adequacy in critically ill patients, given their unique pharmacokinetics, needs investigation. This study included patients from six ICUs in Saint-Etienne and Paris, France, who received continuous ceftazidime infusion with plasma concentration measurements. Using MONOLIX and R, a pharmacokinetic (PK) model was developed, and the literature on ICU patient PK models was reviewed. Simulations calculated the LD needed to reach a 60 mg/L target concentration and assessed ceftazidime exposure for various regimens. Among 86 patients with 223 samples, ceftazidime PK was best described by a one-compartment model with glomerular filtration rate explaining clearance variability. Typical clearance and volume of distribution were 4.45 L/h and 88 L, respectively. The literature median volume of distribution was 37.2 L. Simulations indicated that an LD higher than 2 g was needed to achieve 60 mg/L in 80% of patients, with a median LD of 4.9 g. Our model showed a 4 g LD followed by 6 g/day infusion reached effective concentrations within 1 h, while a 2 g LD caused an 18 h delay in achieving target steady state.

AntibioticsVol. 13(8)
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Inserm (FR), Mines Saint-Étienne (FR), Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne (FR), Université Jean Monnet (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.