Assessment of Exoskeletons for Work Activities: The Dilemma behind the Product

The introduction of exoskeletons by many companies has often resulted in potential users not wanting to wear them. Evaluations of the exoskeleton reveal benefits of use, including ergonomic advantages and a reduction of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. How can this contradiction be explained? By searching the available literature, we can identify the methods used to develop these devices and the methods employed to evaluate their acceptance and benefit. By looking at the product from different viewpoints and involving different disciplines, we will get to the root of this discrepancy. Our findings indicate that the product definition, development focus, and evaluation methods do not sufficiently and adequately address the primary goal of exoskeletons. The development of such devices should be prioritized not only for the delivery of support but also for the motivation of the user. Finally, we put forward the proposal to discuss the establishment of a novel development method for the prospective elaboration of exoskeletons.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2024-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app14167108
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.55

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Exoskeletons for Work Activities: The Dilemma behind the Product

António Moniz, Jérémy Lefint
3 citations
Applied Sciences
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
0.55
article

Assessment of Exoskeletons for Work Activities: The Dilemma behind the Product

António Moniz, Jérémy Lefint
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The introduction of exoskeletons by many companies has often resulted in potential users not wanting to wear them. Evaluations of the exoskeleton reveal benefits of use, including ergonomic advantages and a reduction of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. How can this contradiction be explained? By searching the available literature, we can identify the methods used to develop these devices and the methods employed to evaluate their acceptance and benefit. By looking at the product from different viewpoints and involving different disciplines, we will get to the root of this discrepancy. Our findings indicate that the product definition, development focus, and evaluation methods do not sufficiently and adequately address the primary goal of exoskeletons. The development of such devices should be prioritized not only for the delivery of support but also for the motivation of the user. Finally, we put forward the proposal to discuss the establishment of a novel development method for the prospective elaboration of exoskeletons.

Applied SciencesVol. 14(16)
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), University of Lisbon (PT), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
Universidade de Lisboa, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Centro de Investigação em Ciências Sociais
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
0.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessment of Exoskeletons for Work Activities: The Dilemma behind the Product — António Moniz, Jérémy Lefint · Applied Sciences (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS