“Praise in Public; Criticize in Private”: Unwritable Assessment Comments and the Performance Information That Resists Being Written

When documenting performance information as written comments is viewed as an act of disclosure, it becomes clear why supervisors may feel compelled to leave some comments unwritten. Although supervisors can be supported in writing better assessment comments, their failure to write invites a reexamination of expectations for documenting feedback and performance information as written comments on assessment forms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academic Medicine
Published
2024-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000005839
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Radiology practices and education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Praise in Public; Criticize in Private”: Unwritable Assessment Comments and the Performance Information That Resists Being Written

Shiphra Ginsburg, Andrea Gingerich, Stefanie S. Sebok‐Syer, Lorelei Lingard et al.
3 citations
Academic Medicine
Radiology practices and education
1.21
article

“Praise in Public; Criticize in Private”: Unwritable Assessment Comments and the Performance Information That Resists Being Written

Shiphra Ginsburg, Andrea Gingerich, Stefanie S. Sebok‐Syer, Lorelei Lingard, Christopher Watling
article en
3 citations

Abstract

When documenting performance information as written comments is viewed as an act of disclosure, it becomes clear why supervisors may feel compelled to leave some comments unwritten. Although supervisors can be supported in writing better assessment comments, their failure to write invites a reexamination of expectations for documenting feedback and performance information as written comments on assessment forms.

Academic MedicineVol. 99(11)
Western University (CA), University of Northern British Columbia (CA), Palo Alto University (US), Sinai Health System (CA), Stanford University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Radiology practices and education
1.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.