How should firms orchestrate intrinsic and extrinsic motivational strategies for diverse value-creation outcomes: Synergy or trade-off effect?
Motivational strategies are vital in boosting performance, yet their effectiveness at the firm level remains underexplored. This study proposes a supportive organizational culture as a firm's intrinsic motivational strategy and a rewards-based strategy as its extrinsic motivational strategy. Leveraging from a resource-based view and resource orchestration theory, intrinsic and extrinsic motivational strategies should be uniquely configured to optimize their impact on diverse value-creation tasks. Interview and survey data were collected from Chinese manufacturing firms. Three distinct interaction patterns—none, negative, and positive—were discovered, offering novel insights for industrial firms: First, to fortify a market information system, utilizing intrinsic or extrinsic strategies alone can be effective. Second, negative interaction implies a trade-off decision between intrinsic and extrinsic strategies and warns of resource redundancy for new product innovation development. Lastly, intrinsic strategies positively contribute to objective market performance only when synergizing with a high level of extrinsic strategies. • Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational strategies should be uniquely configured for diverse value-creation tasks. • To fortify a market information system, utilizing intrinsic or extrinsic strategies alone can be effective. • A trade-off decision between intrinsic and extrinsic strategies is needed for new product innovation development. • Intrinsic strategies positively impact objective market performance only with a high level of extrinsic strategies.
Authors
- Yinghong Wei (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9977-7308)
Institutions
- Texas A&M International University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Industrial Marketing Management
- Published
- 2024-08-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2024.07.015
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.66