‘Why Christianity?’: An Analysis of Radical Orthodoxy’s Preference for Christian Theology over Platonism/Neoplatonism

This paper contributes to the scholarly discussion on Radical Orthodoxy by analyzing its retrieval of Christianity. Such analysis will be grounded in two questions, each concerning reasons underlying the Radically Orthodox theologians’ usage of Christian theology despite their dependence on the Platonic notion of participation (μέθεξις) and the validity of the movement’s position if its proponents were to lean instead on Platonism/Neoplatonism. To answer these questions, the author formulates a two-fold explanation constructed through library research. The first part investigates the Radically Orthodox theologians’ argumentation for using Christian theology as shown in the work of John Milbank and Conor Cunningham. The second part evaluates a hypothetical case in which Ralph Cudworth, the Cambridge Platonist with whom the Radically Orthodox theologians claim resonance, were to argue for Radical Orthodoxy’s antisecular agenda.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theological Reflections Eastern European Journal of Theology
Published
2024-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29357/2789-1577.2024.22.1.4
Primary Topic
Religion and Society Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Why Christianity?’: An Analysis of Radical Orthodoxy’s Preference for Christian Theology over Platonism/Neoplatonism

Kornelius Lumbanbatu
Theological Reflections Eastern European Journal of Theology
Religion and Society Interactions
article

‘Why Christianity?’: An Analysis of Radical Orthodoxy’s Preference for Christian Theology over Platonism/Neoplatonism

Kornelius Lumbanbatu
article en

Abstract

This paper contributes to the scholarly discussion on Radical Orthodoxy by analyzing its retrieval of Christianity. Such analysis will be grounded in two questions, each concerning reasons underlying the Radically Orthodox theologians’ usage of Christian theology despite their dependence on the Platonic notion of participation (μέθεξις) and the validity of the movement’s position if its proponents were to lean instead on Platonism/Neoplatonism. To answer these questions, the author formulates a two-fold explanation constructed through library research. The first part investigates the Radically Orthodox theologians’ argumentation for using Christian theology as shown in the work of John Milbank and Conor Cunningham. The second part evaluates a hypothetical case in which Ralph Cudworth, the Cambridge Platonist with whom the Radically Orthodox theologians claim resonance, were to argue for Radical Orthodoxy’s antisecular agenda.

Theological Reflections Eastern European Journal of TheologyVol. 22(1)
Jakarta Theological Seminary (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Religion and Society Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

‘Why Christianity?’: An Analysis of Radical Orthodoxy’s Preference for Christian Theology over Platonism/Neoplatonism — Kornelius Lumbanbatu · Theological Reflections Eastern European Journal of Theology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS