Examining Occupation-Based Outcome Measure Use in a Neurologic Outpatient Occupational Therapy Setting: A Knowledge Translation Initiative

Importance: Occupation-based outcome measures (OBOMs) are an evidence-based recommendation for occupational therapy evaluations. Knowledge translation (KT) is a process used to help integrate evidence into clinical practice. The authors identified a KT opportunity to examine occupational therapy practitioners’ (OTPs) use of outcome measures in an outpatient practice setting and assess a Know-Do Gap as the first step in the Action phase of a KT initiative. Objective: Describe the frequency and types of outcome measures documented in occupational therapy (OT) evaluations, with a focus on OBOMs. Design: Cross-sectional descriptive study. Setting: Three outpatient clinic sites (under one parent company) in the Midwestern United States, serving clients with neurologic conditions. Participants: Retrospective chart reviews. Data Collection and Analysis: Data included client age, diagnosis, and all documented outcome measures by seven OTPs during OT evaluations over a 6-month period. Results: Researchers analyzed 173 charts. Forty-six different outcome measures were documented and categorized. Out of the 46 measures, one was occupation-based, the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, and was administered six times (3.5%) out of 173 evaluations. Conclusion: OBOMs were underutilized in this neurologic outpatient setting, constituting a Know-Do Gap between evidence-based recommendations and practice. Knowledge Translation Takeaway: Findings signify the first step in a site-specific KT initiative, establishing a need for KT intervention to increase the use of OBOMs and standardization of practice. Plain Language Summary: Experts say that occupational therapists (OTs) should use tests that look at real-life activities when they check their patients. This study looked at the types of tests OTs used. Results showed that most of the tests did not look at real-life activities. This difference between what is suggested and what is done is called a gap. With this information, our researchers and the OT team can start working together to close the gap.

Publication Details

Journal
Translational Science in Occupation
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32873/unmc.dc.tso.1.3.01
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining Occupation-Based Outcome Measure Use in a Neurologic Outpatient Occupational Therapy Setting: A Knowledge Translation Initiative

1 citations
Translational Science in Occupation
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
1.72
article

Examining Occupation-Based Outcome Measure Use in a Neurologic Outpatient Occupational Therapy Setting: A Knowledge Translation Initiative

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Importance: Occupation-based outcome measures (OBOMs) are an evidence-based recommendation for occupational therapy evaluations. Knowledge translation (KT) is a process used to help integrate evidence into clinical practice. The authors identified a KT opportunity to examine occupational therapy practitioners’ (OTPs) use of outcome measures in an outpatient practice setting and assess a Know-Do Gap as the first step in the Action phase of a KT initiative. Objective: Describe the frequency and types of outcome measures documented in occupational therapy (OT) evaluations, with a focus on OBOMs. Design: Cross-sectional descriptive study. Setting: Three outpatient clinic sites (under one parent company) in the Midwestern United States, serving clients with neurologic conditions. Participants: Retrospective chart reviews. Data Collection and Analysis: Data included client age, diagnosis, and all documented outcome measures by seven OTPs during OT evaluations over a 6-month period. Results: Researchers analyzed 173 charts. Forty-six different outcome measures were documented and categorized. Out of the 46 measures, one was occupation-based, the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, and was administered six times (3.5%) out of 173 evaluations. Conclusion: OBOMs were underutilized in this neurologic outpatient setting, constituting a Know-Do Gap between evidence-based recommendations and practice. Knowledge Translation Takeaway: Findings signify the first step in a site-specific KT initiative, establishing a need for KT intervention to increase the use of OBOMs and standardization of practice. Plain Language Summary: Experts say that occupational therapists (OTs) should use tests that look at real-life activities when they check their patients. This study looked at the types of tests OTs used. Results showed that most of the tests did not look at real-life activities. This difference between what is suggested and what is done is called a gap. With this information, our researchers and the OT team can start working together to close the gap.

Translational Science in OccupationVol. 1(3)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.