Decision-making method to prioritize and implement solar strategies on neighborhood level

The current research presents a decision-making framework designed to facilitate the development and deployment of solar strategies in new and existing neighborhoods. Designing neighborhoods to achieve optimal solar exposure and integrate potential solar technologies involves numerous factors impacting the design process and decisions. These factors can relate to the neighborhood's layout as well as the proposed technologies and design strategies. Developers and other stakeholders often face the challenge of determining which strategies would be most beneficial for a specific neighborhood. The proposed decision-making tool evaluates solar design strategies to fulfill composite objectives, such as reducing total energy consumption, minimizing operational costs, achieving net-zero energy neighborhoods, and creating low/net-zero carbon neighborhoods. In addition, the user can also select specific objectives such as daylighting, passive heating, passive cooling, energy efficiency, electrical generation, thermal generation as well as combined electrical and thermal generations. The tool allows for the selection of suitable passive and active solar strategies based on the chosen objective. To assess these strategies, an adoption score-based decision-making criterion has been developed, which quantifies factors such as ease of implementation, feasibility (cost and accessibility), acceptance, and environmental impact. To establish the adoption scoring method, quantitative measures are determined through a survey conducted as part of the International Energy Agency (IEA) Task 63 on solar neighborhood planning. Experts with diverse backgrounds evaluated existing passive and active solar technologies and strategies. The application of this approach to specific neighborhood scenarios demonstrates its utility in assisting users in selecting the most appropriate solar strategies. This research contributes to the field by providing a comprehensive framework that integrates both active and passive solar strategies into urban planning. The decision-making tool supports stakeholders in making informed decisions by evaluating and comparing various solar strategies based on a multi-criteria assessment, thereby filling a critical gap in the existing literature. • Criteria-based planning tool to prioritize solar strategies for neighborhoods. • Framework offers tailored recommendations for efficient solar neighborhood planning. • Streamline implementation for efficient and sustainable solar neighborhoods. • Expandable framework for various climatic zones and neighborhood types.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Reports
Published
2024-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.08.009
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decision-making method to prioritize and implement solar strategies on neighborhood level

Kuljeet Singh Grewal, Caroline Hachem-Vermette, Somil Yadav
7 citations
Energy Reports
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
1.86
article

Decision-making method to prioritize and implement solar strategies on neighborhood level

Kuljeet Singh Grewal, Caroline Hachem-Vermette, Somil Yadav
article en
7 citations

Abstract

The current research presents a decision-making framework designed to facilitate the development and deployment of solar strategies in new and existing neighborhoods. Designing neighborhoods to achieve optimal solar exposure and integrate potential solar technologies involves numerous factors impacting the design process and decisions. These factors can relate to the neighborhood's layout as well as the proposed technologies and design strategies. Developers and other stakeholders often face the challenge of determining which strategies would be most beneficial for a specific neighborhood. The proposed decision-making tool evaluates solar design strategies to fulfill composite objectives, such as reducing total energy consumption, minimizing operational costs, achieving net-zero energy neighborhoods, and creating low/net-zero carbon neighborhoods. In addition, the user can also select specific objectives such as daylighting, passive heating, passive cooling, energy efficiency, electrical generation, thermal generation as well as combined electrical and thermal generations. The tool allows for the selection of suitable passive and active solar strategies based on the chosen objective. To assess these strategies, an adoption score-based decision-making criterion has been developed, which quantifies factors such as ease of implementation, feasibility (cost and accessibility), acceptance, and environmental impact. To establish the adoption scoring method, quantitative measures are determined through a survey conducted as part of the International Energy Agency (IEA) Task 63 on solar neighborhood planning. Experts with diverse backgrounds evaluated existing passive and active solar technologies and strategies. The application of this approach to specific neighborhood scenarios demonstrates its utility in assisting users in selecting the most appropriate solar strategies. This research contributes to the field by providing a comprehensive framework that integrates both active and passive solar strategies into urban planning. The decision-making tool supports stakeholders in making informed decisions by evaluating and comparing various solar strategies based on a multi-criteria assessment, thereby filling a critical gap in the existing literature. • Criteria-based planning tool to prioritize solar strategies for neighborhoods. • Framework offers tailored recommendations for efficient solar neighborhood planning. • Streamline implementation for efficient and sustainable solar neighborhoods. • Expandable framework for various climatic zones and neighborhood types.

Energy ReportsVol. 12
University of Prince Edward Island (CA), Indian Institute of Technology Dharwad (IN), Concordia University (CA)
International Energy Agency
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
1.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.