AI-driven modelling approaches for predicting oxygen levels in aquatic environments

Reliable water quality models are crucial for better water management and pollution control. Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and dissolved oxygen (DO) are the widely recognized indicators used to examine the quality of water. Stakeholders often face challenges when it comes to monitoring water quality indicators daily. The conventional approach for testing is laborious and costly. Therefore, there is a need to incorporate alternate concepts for predicting water quality parameters. This article proposes a novel approach “Autoencoder-Deep-Autoregressive (AE-DeepAR)” to predict the concentration of BOD and DO using in-situ measurable water quality parameters as input. The autoencoder is employed to utilize a latent space that accurately captures the fundamental characteristics of the nonlinear data. On the other hand, the DeepAR model is utilized to produce point predictions. This approach is being implemented in the Mahanadi River system for the first time. It is found that conductivity, total suspended solids (TSS), turbidity, and ammoniacal nitrogen ( NH 3 -N) are correlated with BOD. Likewise, turbidity, temperature, and total dissolved solids (TDS) correlate significantly with DO. The performance of the AE-DeepAR model in predicting BOD surpasses that of other models at all stations. The R 2 range from 0.90 to 0.93 , mean absolute error (MAE) varies from 0.061 to 0.147 , mean squared error (MSE) lies between 0.005 to 0.028 , and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) differs from 9.20 % to 19.95 % . All stations show a greater degree of sensitivity. The uncertainty observed is less in most circumstances, but the unpredictability of the values caused by the occurrence of outliers in severe events may influence the outcome. The PICP value varies between 87 % to 95 % in BOD and 89 % to 95 % in DO. The results reveal that AE-DeepAR can be used as an alternative approach to predict BOD and DO with a high degree of accuracy. • The research proposed a framework for predicting oxygen level in aquatic environment using in-situ measuring parameters. • An economical approach that does not need costly equipment or access to a laboratory to gather data. • Highlights the importance of the proposed hybrid model for point prediction and uncertainty analysis. • AE-DeepAR outperforms the AT-LSTM, CNN-LSTM and BiGRU techniques with R 2 value ranging between 0.90 and 0.93. • The PICP value ranges from 85 % to 95 % for BOD and 89 % to 90 % for DO.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Water Process Engineering
Published
2024-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.105940
Citations
18
Primary Topic
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-driven modelling approaches for predicting oxygen levels in aquatic environments

Rosysmita Bikram Singh, Agnieszka I. Olbert, Avinash Samantra, Md Galal Uddin
18 citations
Journal of Water Process Engineering
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
3.70
article

AI-driven modelling approaches for predicting oxygen levels in aquatic environments

Rosysmita Bikram Singh, Agnieszka I. Olbert, Avinash Samantra, Md Galal Uddin
article en
18 citations

Abstract

Reliable water quality models are crucial for better water management and pollution control. Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and dissolved oxygen (DO) are the widely recognized indicators used to examine the quality of water. Stakeholders often face challenges when it comes to monitoring water quality indicators daily. The conventional approach for testing is laborious and costly. Therefore, there is a need to incorporate alternate concepts for predicting water quality parameters. This article proposes a novel approach “Autoencoder-Deep-Autoregressive (AE-DeepAR)” to predict the concentration of BOD and DO using in-situ measurable water quality parameters as input. The autoencoder is employed to utilize a latent space that accurately captures the fundamental characteristics of the nonlinear data. On the other hand, the DeepAR model is utilized to produce point predictions. This approach is being implemented in the Mahanadi River system for the first time. It is found that conductivity, total suspended solids (TSS), turbidity, and ammoniacal nitrogen ( NH 3 -N) are correlated with BOD. Likewise, turbidity, temperature, and total dissolved solids (TDS) correlate significantly with DO. The performance of the AE-DeepAR model in predicting BOD surpasses that of other models at all stations. The R 2 range from 0.90 to 0.93 , mean absolute error (MAE) varies from 0.061 to 0.147 , mean squared error (MSE) lies between 0.005 to 0.028 , and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) differs from 9.20 % to 19.95 % . All stations show a greater degree of sensitivity. The uncertainty observed is less in most circumstances, but the unpredictability of the values caused by the occurrence of outliers in severe events may influence the outcome. The PICP value varies between 87 % to 95 % in BOD and 89 % to 95 % in DO. The results reveal that AE-DeepAR can be used as an alternative approach to predict BOD and DO with a high degree of accuracy. • The research proposed a framework for predicting oxygen level in aquatic environment using in-situ measuring parameters. • An economical approach that does not need costly equipment or access to a laboratory to gather data. • Highlights the importance of the proposed hybrid model for point prediction and uncertainty analysis. • AE-DeepAR outperforms the AT-LSTM, CNN-LSTM and BiGRU techniques with R 2 value ranging between 0.90 and 0.93. • The PICP value ranges from 85 % to 95 % for BOD and 89 % to 90 % for DO.

Journal of Water Process EngineeringVol. 66
National Institute of Technology Rourkela (IN), Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
University of Galway
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
3.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.