Generalized quantum Arimoto–Blahut algorithm and its application to quantum information bottleneck

Abstract Quantum information bottleneck was proposed by Grimsmo and Still (2016 Phys. Rev. A 94 012338) as a promising method for quantum supervised machine learning. To study this method, we generalize the quantum Arimoto–Blahut algorithm by Ramakrishnan et al (2021 IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 67 946) to a function defined over a set of density matrices with linear constraints so that our algorithm can be applied to optimizations of quantum operations. This algorithm has wider applicability, and we apply our algorithm to the quantum information bottleneck with three quantum systems. We numerically compare our obtained algorithm with the existing algorithm by Grimsmo and Still. Our numerical analysis shows that our algorithm is better than their algorithm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quantum Science and Technology
Published
2024-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/ad6eb1
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generalized quantum Arimoto–Blahut algorithm and its application to quantum information bottleneck

Masahito Hayashi, Geng Liu
3 citations
Quantum Science and Technology
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
1.04
article

Generalized quantum Arimoto–Blahut algorithm and its application to quantum information bottleneck

Masahito Hayashi, Geng Liu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Quantum information bottleneck was proposed by Grimsmo and Still (2016 Phys. Rev. A 94 012338) as a promising method for quantum supervised machine learning. To study this method, we generalize the quantum Arimoto–Blahut algorithm by Ramakrishnan et al (2021 IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 67 946) to a function defined over a set of density matrices with linear constraints so that our algorithm can be applied to optimizations of quantum operations. This algorithm has wider applicability, and we apply our algorithm to the quantum information bottleneck with three quantum systems. We numerically compare our obtained algorithm with the existing algorithm by Grimsmo and Still. Our numerical analysis shows that our algorithm is better than their algorithm.

Quantum Science and TechnologyVol. 9(4)
Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen (CN), Beijing Academy of Quantum Information Sciences (CN), Nagoya University (JP)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
1.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.