10.30632/PJV65N4-2024a10 What Causes Mud-Logging Mud Gas Response to Vary and Two Techniques to Quantify Mud Gas

Mud logging, a crucial tool for determining overpressured zones, balancing mud weight to formation pressure, and monitoring gas in formations, is hindered by the widely varying mud gas response the causes of which remain poorly understood. It’s not uncommon to observe a ten-fold variation in mud gas response while drilling formations with similar log characteristics. Furthermore, cumulative production shows a weak correlation with mud-logging mud gas response in horizontal wells. By comprehending and accounting for these mud gas variations, we can significantly enhance the effectiveness of mud logging. In the past, mud gas has been normalized using the drilling rate, hole size, and mud pump rate, yet these factors do not fully explain the mud gas response. Proper lagging of mud gas to its depth, drilling mud flushing in front of the bit, gas solubility in drilling mud, surface losses, gas trap, and sampling design will be discussed and quantified. Two innovative techniques will be introduced to quantify the gas in the formation under varying drilling parameters and conditions. These techniques, namely gas markers and normalization techniques, not only enhance overpressure detection and help determine the balanced mud weight but also provide a quantitative measure of gas in the formation. By using these techniques, mud gas can be a predictor variable in data mining applications, paving the way for enhanced well drilling performance and improved well productivity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30632/pjv65n4-2024a10
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Granular flow and fluidized beds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

10.30632/PJV65N4-2024a10 What Causes Mud-Logging Mud Gas Response to Vary and Two Techniques to Quantify Mud Gas

William S. Donovan
1 citations
Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description
Granular flow and fluidized beds
0.37
article

10.30632/PJV65N4-2024a10 What Causes Mud-Logging Mud Gas Response to Vary and Two Techniques to Quantify Mud Gas

William S. Donovan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Mud logging, a crucial tool for determining overpressured zones, balancing mud weight to formation pressure, and monitoring gas in formations, is hindered by the widely varying mud gas response the causes of which remain poorly understood. It’s not uncommon to observe a ten-fold variation in mud gas response while drilling formations with similar log characteristics. Furthermore, cumulative production shows a weak correlation with mud-logging mud gas response in horizontal wells. By comprehending and accounting for these mud gas variations, we can significantly enhance the effectiveness of mud logging. In the past, mud gas has been normalized using the drilling rate, hole size, and mud pump rate, yet these factors do not fully explain the mud gas response. Proper lagging of mud gas to its depth, drilling mud flushing in front of the bit, gas solubility in drilling mud, surface losses, gas trap, and sampling design will be discussed and quantified. Two innovative techniques will be introduced to quantify the gas in the formation under varying drilling parameters and conditions. These techniques, namely gas markers and normalization techniques, not only enhance overpressure detection and help determine the balanced mud weight but also provide a quantitative measure of gas in the formation. By using these techniques, mud gas can be a predictor variable in data mining applications, paving the way for enhanced well drilling performance and improved well productivity.

Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir DescriptionVol. 65(4)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Granular flow and fluidized beds
0.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.